“In terms of the band of possible options that became possible after Super Tuesday, these are on the most optimistic end of that for progressives,” said one Warren-aligned Dem.
I think mad about is different than being happy about. Obviously there's no one to be happy about, but there hasn't been anything totally egregious yet on the basis of what "progressives" i.e. not socialists (as socialist will never be made happy and idk why anyone would expect otherwise), whereas with Obama it essentially was all egregious.
Succdems don't care about foreign policy, and the extent to which they do it's about use of multilateralism and liberal deplomacy over the John Bolton style bomb and ask questions later approach.
Susan Rice would've also been a worse pick than Blinkin and it was really just between the two of them.
I think mad about is different than being happy about. Obviously there's no one to be happy about, but there hasn't been anything totally egregious yet on the basis of what "progressives" i.e. not socialists (as socialist will never be made happy and idk why anyone would expect otherwise), whereas with Obama it essentially was all egregious.
Blinken is a hawk.
Succdems don't care about foreign policy, and the extent to which they do it's about use of multilateralism and liberal deplomacy over the John Bolton style bomb and ask questions later approach.
Susan Rice would've also been a worse pick than Blinkin and it was really just between the two of them.
Biden did say he was considering putting a republican on the cabinet, that should piss even most milquetoast warren supporter off.
Not necessarily, a lot of libs cum to 'bipartisanship'