I feel like I've seen mixed conflicting things about him and am unsure.

  • NonWonderDog [he/him]
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    Huh? She blames Assange for the cops making up a rape allegation? I don't understand. (Oh, I see, that was a parenthetical by the German paper, she's attacking the United Nations Rapporteur on Torture.) These are the allegations involving "AA":

    1. Unlawful coercion – On 13-14 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange, by using violence, forced the injured party to endure his restricting her freedom of movement. The violence consisted in a firm hold of the injured party’s arms and a forceful spreading of her legs whilst lying on top of her and with his body weight preventing her from moving or shifting.
    2. Sexual molestation: On 13-14 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange deliberately molested the injured party by acting in a manner designed to violate her sexual integrity. Assange, who was aware that it was the expressed wish of the injured party and a prerequisite of sexual intercourse that a condom be used, consummated unprotected sexual intercourse with her without her knowledge.
    3. Sexual molestation: On 18 August 2010 or on any of the days before or after that date, in the home of the injured party [AA] in Stockholm, Assange deliberately molested the injured party by acting in a manner designed to violate her sexual integrity i.e. lying next to her and pressing his naked, erect penis to her body.

    On point 2, specifically she's accusing Assange of deliberately breaking a condom.

    Point 4 was the other woman:

    1. Rape - On 17 August 2010, in the home of the injured party [SW] in Enköping, Assange deliberately consummated sexual intercourse with her by improperly exploiting that she, due to sleep, was in a helpless state.

    "SW" is the one quoted (or "quoted") in Assange's affidavit of not wanting to accuse him of anything.