• zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Even on its own terms, the claim is wrong. We very clearly won the First Gulf War. We won in Kosovo. We flattened Grenada and Panama like pancakes. We won the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan easily, and dominated these countries for decades before the sheer cost of occupying such a remote territory ultimately removed us. We have occupied South Korea uncontested for 70 years and reduced North Korea to a hermit kingdom.

    We pretty unequivocally won the Cold War.

    The problem with all this "winning" is that it has come at the expense of our economic foundations. Or academic sector is crumbling. Our health care sector is three insurance companies in a lab coat. Our transportation and energy infrastructure is 50 years out of date. All that so we can throw trillions into a bloody mess on the frontier that we get to pretend means we're a Superpower.

    • egg1918 [she/her]
      ·
      10 months ago

      We won the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan easily,

      And what happened after the invasions? thonk

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        10 months ago

        We hung out, playing duck hunt with any "military age male" out of diapers for the next twenty years.

    • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
      ·
      10 months ago

      We, the people, did not win. The federal government of the United States at the behest of the interests of Capital won.

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Living in the imperial core, eating the imperial slop, but claiming we've got no interest in the imperial frontier...

        That opium didn't import itself

          • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            This isn't criticism. You're suggesting "the people did not win" when Americans absolutely enjoy material benefits from our relationship with our satraps.

            Very different to say "I criticize how my electronics and energy are produced" and to say "I just don't see any benefit in our relationship to cheap silicon chips and fossil fuels". Again, that opium didn't import itself.

            • Alaskaball [comrade/them]M
              ·
              10 months ago

              This is criticism. The whatever "material benefits" the American working class "enjoy" comes at the overwhelming expense of the fruits of their surplus labor value that they are not entitled to to be used in exploiting the "free" markets of other nations for their resources at the most minimal costs and in turn taking and transforming those commodities into finished commodities to sell back to the workers in the exploiter countries at artificially inflated prices in order to scrape back the financial losses that are paid out to labor in the form of their paltry wages that barely sustain their existence enough to reproduce the cycle.

              Capital very clearly won the First Gulf War. They won in Kosovo. They flattened Grenada and Panama like pancakes. They won the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan easily, and dominated these countries for decades before the sheer cost of occupying such a remote territory ultimately outweighed the profits. They have occupied South Korea uncontested for 70 years and reduced North Korea to a hermit kingdom.

              Capital pretty unequivocally won the Cold War.

              In the end of this vicious cycle, the only winners are the capitalists in their fetishistic pursuit of wealth.

          • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
            ·
            10 months ago

            the surplus labor of the US worker was funnelled directly into defense contractors and then lit on fir

            I'm a Houstonian and I watched this city's economy expand significantly during the war's execution.

            I know people who personally profited from the Pentagon's spending glut. Haliburton HQ is a short drive from my house and one could argue my mortgage payment on a postage stamp property reflects the enormous real estate price inflation resulting from all that federal money flooding into the region.

            Nevermind what Iraq did for the cost of energy, which directly benefits my city's native industry.

            Iraq was, in a certain international geopolitical Sense, a labor disciplining war. It guaranteed that energy profits would continue to flow into the West.

            One could argue this fight with Russia is a similar exercise in disciplining a rival energy exporter.

    • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
      ·
      10 months ago

      in addition to the takes on your use of "we" language, i'd like to press on whether what was done to grenada and panama were "real wars"

      • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
        ·
        10 months ago

        your use of "we" language

        I'm an American. These sins are on my shoulders as much as anyone else's.

        what was done to grenada and panama were "real wars"

        They're as real as any other mass mobilization of a national killing machine.

        • robot_dog_with_gun [they/them]
          ·
          10 months ago

          I'm an American. These sins are on my shoulders as much as anyone else's.

          oh so you're a congressman? or a boot? or a "defense" executive? don't identify with the imperial machine, especially if you didn't ask for any of its crimes or the maintenance of the empire.

          real wars

          i guess you also think the rodney king beating was a fistfight? the addition of "real" means OP is trying to imply extra qualification.

    • MoreAmphibians [none/use name]
      ·
      10 months ago

      Even on its own terms, the claim is wrong. We very clearly won the First Gulf War. We won in Kosovo. We flattened Grenada and Panama like pancakes.

      Why didn't you include Libya?