Modern anarchists are even more of a disjointed non-factor than in Marx’s day. Modern anarchists are pretty much exclusively only in the imperial core, and have made no progress since 1800.
One must not allow oneself to be misled by the cry for “unity.” Those who have this word most often on their lips are those who sow the most dissension, just as at present the Jura Bakuninists in Switzerland, who have provoked all the splits, scream for nothing so much as for unity. Those unity fanatics are either the people of limited intelligence who want to stir everything up together into one nondescript brew, which, the moment it is left to settle, throws up the differences again in much more acute opposition because they are now all together in one pot (you have a fine example of this in Germany with the people who preach the reconciliation of the workers and the petty bourgeoisie)--or else they are people who consciously or unconsciously (like Mühlberger[*], for instance) want to adulterate the movement. For this reason the greatest sectarians and the biggest brawlers and rogues are at certain moments the loudest shouters for unity. Nobody in our lifetime has given us more trouble and been more treacherous than the unity shouters.
insert comment seeming to agree but with the message "anarchists never had a successful revolution" cleverly hidden in it.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
It’s true though
deleted by creator
I didn’t realize Lenin, Stalin, Rosa, Marx and every communist that mocked anarchism was a liberal
deleted by creator
Modern anarchists are even more of a disjointed non-factor than in Marx’s day. Modern anarchists are pretty much exclusively only in the imperial core, and have made no progress since 1800.
deleted by creator
Don’t you have an autonomous zone to plant some tomatoes in before you shoot some random black kids?
deleted by creator
YOU are the ones who were racist and shot innocent black kids
More like banned for exposing your pathetic failures and embarrassing you
deleted by creator
Something something unity among marxists.
One must not allow oneself to be misled by the cry for “unity.” Those who have this word most often on their lips are those who sow the most dissension, just as at present the Jura Bakuninists in Switzerland, who have provoked all the splits, scream for nothing so much as for unity. Those unity fanatics are either the people of limited intelligence who want to stir everything up together into one nondescript brew, which, the moment it is left to settle, throws up the differences again in much more acute opposition because they are now all together in one pot (you have a fine example of this in Germany with the people who preach the reconciliation of the workers and the petty bourgeoisie)--or else they are people who consciously or unconsciously (like Mühlberger[*], for instance) want to adulterate the movement. For this reason the greatest sectarians and the biggest brawlers and rogues are at certain moments the loudest shouters for unity. Nobody in our lifetime has given us more trouble and been more treacherous than the unity shouters.