it’s completely valid to argue that Kruschev’s path of change was fundamentally flawed while the Dengist one was proper
I think that is the typical argument. Basically, in the situation in the USSR at the time, there was no need to do what Khrushchev did (IMO, some changes should have been done, but not what was done), but the correct reforms were taken in China, given their situation (I'm not 100% on board with that, but I am somewhat on board). That's the default ML line these days.
I think that is the typical argument. Basically, in the situation in the USSR at the time, there was no need to do what Khrushchev did (IMO, some changes should have been done, but not what was done), but the correct reforms were taken in China, given their situation (I'm not 100% on board with that, but I am somewhat on board). That's the default ML line these days.