• ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
    hexbear
    11
    9 months ago

    Anyone can swear an oath to a divine being, it doesn't make you a paladin. You have to swear an oath so hard you get superpowers to be a paladin.

      • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
        hexbear
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hobbits' natural lack of ambition protects them from the effects of the ring. All of the hobbits had that power.

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
            hexbear
            4
            9 months ago

            Sam wasn't any better at resisting the ring than the other hobbits. There's a reason Frodo carried the ring the whole way, not Sam.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    hexbear
    3
    9 months ago

    What's a paladin?

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Otf9Bnm48Kk

  • @Rheios@ttrpg.network
    hexbear
    3
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes and no.

    If he'd gotten powers from the divine oath-giver he'd be a Warlock or Cleric, dependent upon the nature of their relationship and the being's powers.

    If he got the powers himself from his absolute rigid dedication to his oath, then he'd be a 5e Paladin (I prefer "Dedicant" or "Crusader" for which Paladin should be a specific Oath but that's a different conversation).

    Otherwise in older editions he'd probably just be a devout warrior.

    For those older editions he'd only be a Paladin if the oath he held to was far more specific and arguably he and several of the other hobbits were a bit too quick and dirty for. Particularly during the era of Racial restrictions to classes which didn't allow halfling Paladins. (Assuming halflings to hobbits is 1:1 in all settings, which is far less consistent over time.)

    For how a generous DM might work around that in older editions sometimes, I'd look to BG2's Mazzy Fentan: https://baldursgate.fandom.com/wiki/Mazzy_Fentan