With the amount of labor hours put into it you'd think they'd catch shit like that, but no, crunch is only for mass producing slop, not making content better.
i think its less a "can we make this content better" and more a "what is the intended purpose behind this content and what effect does it currently have" question that would catch something like this.
someone only looking for "better content" would find "accurate portrayal of medical device used by neurologists" as being great superb wonderful because better is a very vague notion.
someone that questions why that content exists and what effect it has would presumably not find it to be so great.
but idk, youre not wrong. the quality control here is definitely fucked, to allow seizure inducing displays through like that
With the amount of labor hours put into it you'd think they'd catch shit like that, but no, crunch is only for mass producing slop, not making content better.
i think its less a "can we make this content better" and more a "what is the intended purpose behind this content and what effect does it currently have" question that would catch something like this.
someone only looking for "better content" would find "accurate portrayal of medical device used by neurologists" as being great superb wonderful because better is a very vague notion.
someone that questions why that content exists and what effect it has would presumably not find it to be so great.
but idk, youre not wrong. the quality control here is definitely fucked, to allow seizure inducing displays through like that