• LeninWeave [none/use name]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Specifically singling out babies to me read as a bioessentialist take

    While you're correct that it would normally make sense to read it that way, the only reason anyone is talking about babies at all is that the IOF invented a story about "40 beheaded babies" and then immediately said they would not investigate it or provide any evidence. Given that context, I don't think it necessarily makes sense to interpret it as bioessentialist, but rather as an angry (incorrect) reaction to all of the "Hamas are evil baby killers" propaganda.

    To clarify, this is not meant to justify the removed comment which was deranged regardless. Just because the evil settler genocide army is making things up about killing babies, that doesn't suddenly mean that killing babies is good. jesus-christ

    • pillow
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator