In recent months, Stanley Kubrick’s daughter Vivian has tweeted anti-Semitic memes, joked about the murder of AOC, cheered on the Proud Boys, and promoted QAnon conspiracies.
Well you got banned so idk why I’m bothering, but in case there’s any other fake moonies here.
The broadcast was picked up by several independent agencies, including, get this, the Soviet Union. So when your mortal enemies admit you did it you probably did it. Plus they put reflective panels on the surface of the moon that any decently funded college astronomy program can, and several have, shoot lasers at to reflect back at Earth.
As for the flag thing they put a telescopic pole on the top of the flag to make it stand upright cuz they knew it wouldn’t wave with no atmosphere. You can vaguely see this in the picks if you look closely enough.
When your mortal enemies admit you did it you probably did it
The Soviet Union gave cover for other American Big Lies, most notably the CIA assassination of JFK. The moon landing hoax supporters claim that the CPSU Central Committee covered for the moon landing in order to negotiate detente with the US.
They put reflective panels on the surface of the moon that any decently funded college astronomy program can, and several have, shoot lasers at to reflect back at Earth.
The US and the Soviet Union both carried out unmanned trips to the moon which left reflective panels. No one disputes unmanned trips to the moon.
The evidence that the moon landing was faked is more compelling to me than the evidence that it happened. But there won't be consensus on the moon landing until Russia or China manage a manned trip.
It is absolutely absurd that humanity cannot reproduce the moon landing 50 years later.
The USSR under Khrushchev wanted to pursue "peaceful coexistence" with the US. The stated objective was to provide the USSR an opportunity to develop its production capabilities following the genocidal Nazi war of aggression. Accusing the CIA of assassinating its own head of state in order to prevent reconciliation with Cuba & further the Vietnam War would have made "peaceful coexistence" impossible.
If you believe the theory that Khrushchevites assassinated Stalin, then Khrushchev would also have to consider a retaliatory response from the US which legitimized that conspiracy.
There were other, non-governmental science organizations that picked up the signal. Also the whole mission was a very public, open to the media operation that involved a lot of people, most of whom were civilians. It really would have been hard to keep all those mouths shut, for this long, there would have been a whistle blower by now if it was fake. This is opposed to an assassination which may only need a handful of people to organize and so is easier to keep under wraps.
Also the whole mission was a very public, open to the media operation that involved a lot of people, most of whom were civilians. It really would have been hard to keep all those mouths shut.
Not that many people need to be in on the conspiracy. There was widely publicized criticisms of the Apollo program throughout the 60's claiming it was impossible. That's why it was called a "moonshot." Even the mainstream news outlets were reporting on the fact that it had a 0.0017% chance of succeeding. The conspiracy only requires that the astronauts were not in the rocket.
It really would have been hard to keep all those mouths shut, for this long, there would have been a whistle blower by now if it was fake.
There have been whistleblowers. Bill Kaysing, Brian Todd O'Leary to name a couple. Also, Gus Grissom - the Apollo astronaut who burned to the death in the Apollo 1 tests - was openly critical of the impossibility of the Apollo program. His wife and son are under the impression that he was murdered for these criticisms.
This is opposed to an assassination which may only need a handful of people to organize and so is easier to keep under wraps.
The coverup of the JFK assassination was a massive operation with a ton of holes in it. That's why a sizable portion of the US does not believe the official story. The same is true for the moon landings.
This page is the best collection of sources on this topic. Feel free to give it a read over. Again, I'm only claiming that there's more to the criticisms of the moon landing than most people realize. This theory won't be put to rest until a moon landing happens outside the Apollo program.
Not that many people need to be in on the conspiracy. There was widely publicized criticisms of the Apollo program throughout the 60’s claiming it was impossible. That’s why it was called a “moonshot.” Even the mainstream news outlets were reporting on the fact that it had a 0.0017% chance of succeeding. The conspiracy only requires that the astronauts were not in the rocket.
Seems weird that the government would pay out such big bucks to have a bunch of engineers work on a fake rocket, have a bunch of dudes sit in a fake control room, and make it all convincing enough that they believed they were all actually sending a guy to the moon. Must have been a lot of effort to make all those computers print out fake data that was enough to convince the scientists "yup we landed that dude".
I'll have to investigate the whistle blower thing.
Seems weird that the government would pay out such big bucks to have a bunch of engineers work on a fake rocket, have a bunch of dudes sit in a fake control room, and make it all convincing enough that they believed they were all actually sending a guy to the moon. Must have been a lot of effort to make all those computers print out fake data that was enough to convince the scientists “yup we landed that dude”.
Not any more effort than was required for the coverup of biological war crimes on Korean peninsula, the OPCW lie about Bashar Al-Assad using chemical weapons on his own population, or the OPCW lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Faking the moon landing seems like a much easier lie to maintain than the other lies of the US empire.
Here's probably the best effort-post on the hoax side of the discussion [1] It mostly discusses the circumstantial evidence that hoaxers and debunkers focus on.
The flag was rippling, Stan.
Well you got banned so idk why I’m bothering, but in case there’s any other fake moonies here.
The broadcast was picked up by several independent agencies, including, get this, the Soviet Union. So when your mortal enemies admit you did it you probably did it. Plus they put reflective panels on the surface of the moon that any decently funded college astronomy program can, and several have, shoot lasers at to reflect back at Earth.
As for the flag thing they put a telescopic pole on the top of the flag to make it stand upright cuz they knew it wouldn’t wave with no atmosphere. You can vaguely see this in the picks if you look closely enough.
Pretty sure they were banned for defending ISIS in another thread lol
Which is evidence to my point
The Soviet Union gave cover for other American Big Lies, most notably the CIA assassination of JFK. The moon landing hoax supporters claim that the CPSU Central Committee covered for the moon landing in order to negotiate detente with the US.
The US and the Soviet Union both carried out unmanned trips to the moon which left reflective panels. No one disputes unmanned trips to the moon.
The evidence that the moon landing was faked is more compelling to me than the evidence that it happened. But there won't be consensus on the moon landing until Russia or China manage a manned trip.
It is absolutely absurd that humanity cannot reproduce the moon landing 50 years later.
deleted by creator
The USSR under Khrushchev wanted to pursue "peaceful coexistence" with the US. The stated objective was to provide the USSR an opportunity to develop its production capabilities following the genocidal Nazi war of aggression. Accusing the CIA of assassinating its own head of state in order to prevent reconciliation with Cuba & further the Vietnam War would have made "peaceful coexistence" impossible.
If you believe the theory that Khrushchevites assassinated Stalin, then Khrushchev would also have to consider a retaliatory response from the US which legitimized that conspiracy.
deleted by creator
Because the USSR didn't change their strategy. They did successfully negotiated detente with the US in the mid 70's.
deleted by creator
⬇️
There were other, non-governmental science organizations that picked up the signal. Also the whole mission was a very public, open to the media operation that involved a lot of people, most of whom were civilians. It really would have been hard to keep all those mouths shut, for this long, there would have been a whistle blower by now if it was fake. This is opposed to an assassination which may only need a handful of people to organize and so is easier to keep under wraps.
Not that many people need to be in on the conspiracy. There was widely publicized criticisms of the Apollo program throughout the 60's claiming it was impossible. That's why it was called a "moonshot." Even the mainstream news outlets were reporting on the fact that it had a 0.0017% chance of succeeding. The conspiracy only requires that the astronauts were not in the rocket.
There have been whistleblowers. Bill Kaysing, Brian Todd O'Leary to name a couple. Also, Gus Grissom - the Apollo astronaut who burned to the death in the Apollo 1 tests - was openly critical of the impossibility of the Apollo program. His wife and son are under the impression that he was murdered for these criticisms.
The coverup of the JFK assassination was a massive operation with a ton of holes in it. That's why a sizable portion of the US does not believe the official story. The same is true for the moon landings.
This page is the best collection of sources on this topic. Feel free to give it a read over. Again, I'm only claiming that there's more to the criticisms of the moon landing than most people realize. This theory won't be put to rest until a moon landing happens outside the Apollo program.
Seems weird that the government would pay out such big bucks to have a bunch of engineers work on a fake rocket, have a bunch of dudes sit in a fake control room, and make it all convincing enough that they believed they were all actually sending a guy to the moon. Must have been a lot of effort to make all those computers print out fake data that was enough to convince the scientists "yup we landed that dude".
I'll have to investigate the whistle blower thing.
Not any more effort than was required for the coverup of biological war crimes on Korean peninsula, the OPCW lie about Bashar Al-Assad using chemical weapons on his own population, or the OPCW lie that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction.
Faking the moon landing seems like a much easier lie to maintain than the other lies of the US empire.
Here's probably the best effort-post on the hoax side of the discussion [1] It mostly discusses the circumstantial evidence that hoaxers and debunkers focus on.