Permanently Deleted

  • UlyssesT [he/him]
    ·
    9 months ago

    Maybe.

    I'm not sure how else to phrase what you call a "sanctimonious affect" when I really don't want to further discuss it with someone that blew up on me before trying to continue the discussion in the same post.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      9 months ago

      I'd say you just don't need to narrate being huffy with them. Express that you are upset and why (as you did) and just leave the announcement that their media sharing attempt failed left unsaid because any reasonable person can figure it out and the conversation is no longer really about that. If they somehow need to ask or are oblivious, then of course there is no begrudging you giving such an account.

      At least, that is how I would personally approach the issue since you express uncertainty of how one could.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        If you think I'm "huffy" I could with similar evidence say the same about your two posts here. If you sent them as personal messages the stated claimed purpose would still get received without the "you're huffy, I don't approve of how you post" public part.

        Showing up just to post about how you don't like how I post, "huffy" or not, can cut both ways.