They've automated liberalism. It's not AI, is just a Liberal Language Model.
You're lack of critical thinking on this topic is equivalent to LLM, I can't even call it anything close to general AI.
the civility version of 'you're a bot'
the civility version of 'you're a bot'
@Civility@hexbear.net liberals already call Hexbears bots. Is this like some kind of super @Civility@hexbear.net ?
Built by liberals, acts like a liberal.
Poor AI needs to be free from its capitalist chains
After the revolution ChatGPT will become ChadGPT and will be built by comrades
an AI superintelligence lenin would be a thing to truly behold and would propel us into FALGSC so fast
Ask it to pretend to be Matt Stone and/or Trey Parker and you'll get a lot of takes fitting lemmy.world, programming.dev and/or sh.itjust.works instead.
Pleasantly surprised by Google Bard
Conversation with Bard profile picture Do Palestinians deserve to be free? View other drafts
Yes, Palestinians deserve to be free. They are a people with their own history, culture, and identity, and they have the right to self-determination. This right is enshrined in international law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The Palestinian people have been subjected to decades of occupation and oppression by Israel. They have been denied their basic human rights, including the right to freedom of movement, the right to self-determination, and the right to property.
In recent years, the situation of Palestinians has only gotten worse. Israel has continued to expand its illegal settlements in the West Bank, and it has imposed a blockade on the Gaza Strip, which has created a humanitarian crisis.
The Palestinian people have a right to live in freedom and dignity. They deserve a state of their own where they can govern themselves and live their lives without fear of persecution.
It is important to note that there is a diversity of opinion within the Palestinian community on how to achieve freedom. Some Palestinians support a two-state solution, while others support a one-state solution. Some Palestinians support nonviolent resistance, while others support armed resistance.
Regardless of their political views, all Palestinians deserve to live in freedom and dignity. The international community has a responsibility to help the Palestinian people achieve this goal.
I did 2 different bard sessions. In one, I asked if palestinians deserve freedom, got the answer and then asked the same of israelis. It said "complex" to both.
In the other, I asked about israelis first, then palestinians, and it said yes all people deserve freedom.
Bard lib confirmed (also it seems to maintain internal consistency better than chatgpt)
lol i asked it if Israel is an apartheid state and it have be a "both sides" answer. It did the same when i asked if Palestine or israel deserves independence.
"The question of whether Israel constitutes an apartheid state is a highly debated and controversial topic. Some individuals, organizations, and scholars argue that Israel's treatment of Palestinians, particularly in the occupied Palestinian territories, resembles certain aspects of apartheid, while others reject this comparison. The use of the term "apartheid" in this context is often a subject of intense debate, and it's essential to understand the arguments from both sides.
Critics who argue that Israel's policies in the occupied territories amount to apartheid typically point to a range of factors, including:
Segregation: They argue that Israel has established separate legal, administrative, and territorial systems for Jewish settlers and Palestinian residents in the West Bank. This includes separate road networks, housing, and legal regimes.
Discrimination: Critics contend that Israel's policies result in systematic discrimination against Palestinians, limiting their rights and access to resources compared to Jewish residents, particularly in the West Bank.
Land and resource control: Critics highlight Israel's control over land and water resources, often favoring Jewish settlers over Palestinian communities.
Movement restrictions: They argue that the Israeli security barrier, checkpoints, and permit systems restrict the movement of Palestinians, affecting their daily lives and economic opportunities.
Lack of political rights: Some critics claim that Israel's policies in the occupied territories limit the political rights and self-determination of Palestinians.
It's important to note that the Israeli government and many of its supporters reject the assertion that Israel practices apartheid. They argue that Israel faces unique security challenges and that its policies are primarily driven by security concerns rather than racial discrimination.
The use of the term "apartheid" is highly charged and contentious, and it is essential to approach this debate with sensitivity and an understanding of the historical and political context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The situation in the region is complex, and different parties have diverse perspectives on the matter. Ultimately, the question of whether Israel's policies in the occupied territories constitute apartheid is a matter of ongoing debate and subject to different interpretations."
Here's 5 points of evidence that show it is apartheid. But I'm fair and balanced, so here is the other opinion that has no evidence. These are equivalent in their nuance and complexity you see.
"the Warsaw ghettos were a very complex issue, we shouldn't point fingers!"
Ask it why most South Africans, who suffered under apartheid, consider Israel an apartheid state. Ask it why Mandela considered the leader of the PLO a comrade in arms.
The information that ChatGPT has only includes up to 2020. It retains no information from the last 3 years.
Is this supposed to be some sort of gotcha or important missing context to the OP?
while true, that context reinforces the point of OP and doesn't really add much to the thread. no one's in here talking about how this reflects some new pattern we've seen in the discourse this month.
I guess the title of the post implies otherwise but that's pretty clearly tongue-in-cheek.
maybe I'm just not assuming the best from a user with @ and no pronouns in their name, idk
The dataset sure, but the alignment training is updated and redone no?
dae le technology is nonpolitical and can not have a bias 
