I don't know what gave you the impression that I am an American, but I am not. And honestly, I wouldn't call the US a model democracy, it definitely has markings of an oligarchy.
(looking at you with confusion)
How is that a counterexample?
The people who voted for Hitler were Nazis, my point still stands.
Hindenburg was the centrist choice at the time, yes. However, he wasn't a centrist, but a rightist (is that a word?). He was much more afraid of the Commies than of the Nazis.
This is what led to him later betraying the people that elected him by making Hitler chancellor, giving power to exactly the one person his voters so desperately tried to keep out of it.
Hindenburg was the centrist choice at the time, yes. However, he wasn’t a centrist
Woah, woah, woah. Is he a centrist or not? I think you’re just retroactively labeling him a “rightist” because he let the Nazis gain power, despite being elected on the premise that he was opposed to them.
There’s a reason people here say that liberalism is the moderate wing of fascism, and it’s that when it really matters, liberals will choose the fascists over anything remotely resembling communism time and again.
Hindenburg was an Aristocrat, highly conservative and pretty libertarian. He disapproved of the Nazis, but resented communists. In any other context, you wouldn't even consider calling him a centrist, only in the previously mentioned election could he seem as one, with the other two candidates being a communist and a nazi. Had there also been a social democrat candidate, thats who I'd call the closest thing to a centrist. Such a candidate would not have cooperated with the Nazis any more than with the commies, maybe it would have worked out. We'll never know.
So I guess the main thing I'm disagreeing with you on is, that I don't consider libertarians to be centrists. In my eyes they too are extremists, maybe not quite as overtly dangerous as Nazis and Commies, but definitaly just as much a threat to democracy and society.
Maybe. I guess the problem is that the word “centrist” in and of itself is irredeemably vague.
What is a centrist? Someone who wants to keep things exactly as they are? That’s a conservative.
The “median” political position of the Overton window? In the USSR or China, a “centrist” position would be some kind of Marxist position.
Can we please just use clearer words? You want to talk about social democrats? Fine, do that (I wish they weren’t our “far left” in the US). Plenty of comrades can give a great discussion about them (they at least pretend to care, although they unfortunately can align with the fascists too much). But do you consider a social democrat to be the meaning of “centrist” in contemporary German politics?
I agree that the term is pretty vague. I use it mainly as the opposite of the term "extremist". And that's kinda the point i think, it does not clearly define a set of political opinions, but rather describes any moderate position with a general willingness to compromise and cooperate, a commitment to democracy, as well as condemnation of political violence.
So while in contemporary German politics, I wouldn't equate social democrats with centrists, I would say that they are the most centrist party currently in parliament.
I absolutely don't mind using other terminology, but I do believe that the term "centrist" can be useful sometimes. And after all, this post being about centrists is the reason we are talking about the term in the first place.
Ok, I agree that politicians are often corrupt and don't necessarily act in the interest of the people, but what does this have to do with centrism?
Anyway, if you wanna get rid of politicians, what do you propose?
Im all for some kind of direct democracy, in the age of the internet this isn't even unrealistic anymore. Proposals could be made and voted on just like Lemmy posts. Or if we wanna stick with elected officials, we might implement some real time election system, where instead of voting every few years, you could just register your vote in a monthly poll on any device with internet access (of course this would require everyone to have internet access at least once a month)
I don't know what gave you the impression that I am an American, but I am not. And honestly, I wouldn't call the US a model democracy, it definitely has markings of an oligarchy. (looking at you with confusion)
Looks like you're German from a brief glance at your comment history?
The 1932 elections were such a perfect counterexample to your point.
Ironically enough, the 1932 presidential election was the last direct presidential election y'all had, and the Nazi Party lost the election.
How is that a counterexample? The people who voted for Hitler were Nazis, my point still stands. Hindenburg was the centrist choice at the time, yes. However, he wasn't a centrist, but a rightist (is that a word?). He was much more afraid of the Commies than of the Nazis. This is what led to him later betraying the people that elected him by making Hitler chancellor, giving power to exactly the one person his voters so desperately tried to keep out of it.
Woah, woah, woah. Is he a centrist or not? I think you’re just retroactively labeling him a “rightist” because he let the Nazis gain power, despite being elected on the premise that he was opposed to them.
There’s a reason people here say that liberalism is the moderate wing of fascism, and it’s that when it really matters, liberals will choose the fascists over anything remotely resembling communism time and again.
Hindenburg was an Aristocrat, highly conservative and pretty libertarian. He disapproved of the Nazis, but resented communists. In any other context, you wouldn't even consider calling him a centrist, only in the previously mentioned election could he seem as one, with the other two candidates being a communist and a nazi. Had there also been a social democrat candidate, thats who I'd call the closest thing to a centrist. Such a candidate would not have cooperated with the Nazis any more than with the commies, maybe it would have worked out. We'll never know.
So I guess the main thing I'm disagreeing with you on is, that I don't consider libertarians to be centrists. In my eyes they too are extremists, maybe not quite as overtly dangerous as Nazis and Commies, but definitaly just as much a threat to democracy and society.
Maybe. I guess the problem is that the word “centrist” in and of itself is irredeemably vague.
What is a centrist? Someone who wants to keep things exactly as they are? That’s a conservative.
The “median” political position of the Overton window? In the USSR or China, a “centrist” position would be some kind of Marxist position.
Can we please just use clearer words? You want to talk about social democrats? Fine, do that (I wish they weren’t our “far left” in the US). Plenty of comrades can give a great discussion about them (they at least pretend to care, although they unfortunately can align with the fascists too much). But do you consider a social democrat to be the meaning of “centrist” in contemporary German politics?
I agree that the term is pretty vague. I use it mainly as the opposite of the term "extremist". And that's kinda the point i think, it does not clearly define a set of political opinions, but rather describes any moderate position with a general willingness to compromise and cooperate, a commitment to democracy, as well as condemnation of political violence.
So while in contemporary German politics, I wouldn't equate social democrats with centrists, I would say that they are the most centrist party currently in parliament.
I absolutely don't mind using other terminology, but I do believe that the term "centrist" can be useful sometimes. And after all, this post being about centrists is the reason we are talking about the term in the first place.
I'm sorry, repeat my statement and insert your own shitty politicians. I shouldn't have assumed
Ok, I agree that politicians are often corrupt and don't necessarily act in the interest of the people, but what does this have to do with centrism?
Anyway, if you wanna get rid of politicians, what do you propose?
Im all for some kind of direct democracy, in the age of the internet this isn't even unrealistic anymore. Proposals could be made and voted on just like Lemmy posts. Or if we wanna stick with elected officials, we might implement some real time election system, where instead of voting every few years, you could just register your vote in a monthly poll on any device with internet access (of course this would require everyone to have internet access at least once a month)