Eh I mean that's not really the character I've seen of most. Sure, there are those among them that get highly upvoted because of their obscenely large stakes in a position they share, but most of them I guarantee have $3000 or less in this, and for many of them that is a huge amount to risk. Regardless of good or bad, they fell into the community of wallstreetbets, and it just so happened to be the setting for a huge lesson on the disfunction of capitalist reality. Sure, this alone will not change them. They still likely mainly care about it as a lottery ticket, but every day that passes the small part of them grows larger that cares more about the rebellious/destabilizing nature of it (or at least intended) .
I know there's a lot of disgusting throwing around of obscene amounts of wealth on WSB, but the bulk of them are in similar financial situation to a lot of those here. Can't fault people for seeing a win-win of the chance to make much-needed money with the added benefit of it being at the expense of the ultra wealthy who nearly every single person on the subreddit absolutely abhors already.
Long ways to go for sure, and there's certainly potential for reversal or slipping back into their previous state, but given the dismal state of the left in the US I will take any opportunity as a win.
but most of them I guarantee have $3000 or less in this
Let me stop you right there. This article is from 2017 and I know it's only gotten worse, but most Americans can't afford a $500 surprise expense. The joke on WSB is they spent their stimmy on stonks, but most people need all of their stimulus for basic fucking needs. What I am saying is if you can afford to gamble any amount of money on the stock market above a couple hundred bucks, you are doing so from a place of privilege most Americans cannot.
For the record I'm not browbeating leftists who play the market or who are financially secure, I'm not even saying it's wasted energy to talk to WSB people. But I keep seeing people say "Yeah we're sticking it to the rich people!" and I just think it's a red herring. Until these people start losing their homes to the banks, they will be more materially aligned with the interests of capital and act that way.
These WSB people see themselves as the victims because they lost a little disposable income, but this viewpoint is liberal. It's based in the individual prosperity mindset and they will continue to justify that liberal mindset by saying "government intervention." Very, very few of them will look at the practice itself and say that capitalist investment as a whole is coercive and unjust. Go talk to a grocery store worker, an unhoused person, an undocumented person, etc. and they will be much more likely to come to the conclusion that capitalism preys on the weak. Those are the people who need class rhetoric. The lived experience of WSB people will be "I deserve more than I got" without recognizing their significant privilege.
Eh I mean that's not really the character I've seen of most. Sure, there are those among them that get highly upvoted because of their obscenely large stakes in a position they share, but most of them I guarantee have $3000 or less in this, and for many of them that is a huge amount to risk. Regardless of good or bad, they fell into the community of wallstreetbets, and it just so happened to be the setting for a huge lesson on the disfunction of capitalist reality. Sure, this alone will not change them. They still likely mainly care about it as a lottery ticket, but every day that passes the small part of them grows larger that cares more about the rebellious/destabilizing nature of it (or at least intended) .
I know there's a lot of disgusting throwing around of obscene amounts of wealth on WSB, but the bulk of them are in similar financial situation to a lot of those here. Can't fault people for seeing a win-win of the chance to make much-needed money with the added benefit of it being at the expense of the ultra wealthy who nearly every single person on the subreddit absolutely abhors already.
Long ways to go for sure, and there's certainly potential for reversal or slipping back into their previous state, but given the dismal state of the left in the US I will take any opportunity as a win.
Let me stop you right there. This article is from 2017 and I know it's only gotten worse, but most Americans can't afford a $500 surprise expense. The joke on WSB is they spent their stimmy on stonks, but most people need all of their stimulus for basic fucking needs. What I am saying is if you can afford to gamble any amount of money on the stock market above a couple hundred bucks, you are doing so from a place of privilege most Americans cannot.
For the record I'm not browbeating leftists who play the market or who are financially secure, I'm not even saying it's wasted energy to talk to WSB people. But I keep seeing people say "Yeah we're sticking it to the rich people!" and I just think it's a red herring. Until these people start losing their homes to the banks, they will be more materially aligned with the interests of capital and act that way.
These WSB people see themselves as the victims because they lost a little disposable income, but this viewpoint is liberal. It's based in the individual prosperity mindset and they will continue to justify that liberal mindset by saying "government intervention." Very, very few of them will look at the practice itself and say that capitalist investment as a whole is coercive and unjust. Go talk to a grocery store worker, an unhoused person, an undocumented person, etc. and they will be much more likely to come to the conclusion that capitalism preys on the weak. Those are the people who need class rhetoric. The lived experience of WSB people will be "I deserve more than I got" without recognizing their significant privilege.