Tankiedesantski [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 4 years agoYour daily dose of Vitamin C-ope, brought to you by the LARPers on /r/geopoliticsexternal-linkmessage-square37 fedilinkarrow-up152file-text
arrow-up152external-linkYour daily dose of Vitamin C-ope, brought to you by the LARPers on /r/geopoliticsTankiedesantski [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 4 years agomessage-square37 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMolotovHalfEmpty [he/him]hexbear40·4 years ago I think the US would literally find a reason to spark up military conflict before they would allow the dollar to fall and China to take the seat as economic powerhouse of the world. I think that would be better for global stability in the long run. Starting WW3 in the name of 'global stability'. link
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]hexagonhexbear29·4 years agoI suppose an irradiated wasteland devoid of all life is technically "stable" in one sense of the word. link
Starting WW3 in the name of 'global stability'.
I suppose an irradiated wasteland devoid of all life is technically "stable" in one sense of the word.
deleted by creator