I'm willing to bet many people here started their radicalization because of the Sanders campaign 5 years ago, and certainly many Qanon people weren't that into politics before Trump. The time frame makes perfect sense.
I mean.. it's been 6 years. Very possible that she was fairly reasonable and he was apolitical 6 years ago, and they both moved in opposite directions from there.
There were legitimately socialist/anarchist/egalitarian sentiments in Europe at the time, but certainly calling the capitalists right wing at the tome of the Boston Tea Party is a bit nonsensical.
I'm dating a lib, but she's for M4A, trans rights, etc, so it's really just the capitalism bit and to what extent we should tolerate shitheads that we disagree on, so it's not as bad as defending slavery, but honestly it's not too bad.
Real talk, I'm here to shitpost, read shitposts, and every now and then be there to offer/receive support to/from the great people here. This is not going to be an effective organizing platform.
I believe starting in the 70's and continuing into the 80's and 90's, people were talking about a new ice age caused by widespread use of aerosols, and between the 40's and the 70's, there was some cooling happening, and some scientific papers suggested this would continue, though they were in the minority even at that time, as the effects of GHG's were expected to overtake the cooling caused by aerosols by basically any reasonable model even back then.. However, the "ice age" story was signal boosted by a lot of people in the MSM at the time. So, if you dad formed his opinion on the topic in the mid 70's and just never really looked into it or was never really reading scientific papers, it's easy that he just thought the one article he read on the topic from Time or Newsweek was still relevant...
Or it could just be the MAGA chuds at his work.. and maybe they read it once in Time or Newsweek in the mid 70's.. Or they just made it up because they needed to combat the ACC science.
Individuals abstaining from meat won't, but ending animal agriculture (at least to the extent it happens now) has to happen one way or the other or we're fucked, and the more people who eat meat, the harder it is to do that.
They aren't banned words, you just can't call someone a simp, incel, or virgin as an insult.
Honestly, that probably depends on the makeup of the legislature next year, in the US at least. This is absolutely the kind of thing that should have a price ceiling or be provided free of charge, but I could see the GOP legit letting then price gouge the shit out of it.
They literally shut everything down and told everyone to stay inside except for a few people who were tested regularly who brought food to everyone else. The shut down lasted less than a month, and they were back to normal. They also were very strict about letting people in afterwards. If the whole planet did the same thing they did, the virus would have been dealt with by the end of March.
lol yea I meant Mondragon, but my brain was struggling when I wrote that lol.
lol...oops. Yes I was. My brain hasn't recovered from the weekend yet.
Also just the obvious false premise that only black people get cancer. The real difference between white people and black people in this regard is that when white people get shit like this, it's removed before it gets anywhere near as bad.
Barely anyone actually owns their business outright, first of all. Second, why would anyone work for a business if they have to pay the owner to work there? Because they need to be able to eat and want to be able to buy shit they want. People produce because we want and need the outputs of production. People create companies because some (most) things are better made with multiple people rather than one guy by himself. There is no difference between the workers choosing to start a business and sharing in the collective outputs of their labor and a owner buying a a business and finding people desperate enough to exploit themselves for survival, except in the first arrangement, there doesn't have to be the threat of destitution baked into the functioning of the economy. People want the outputs of labor, so they'll do labor to get them. Pretty simple.
Edit: In person, the real response is "So you think that Worker-owned businesses like Bob's Red Mill, New Belgium Brewing (before they sold), Mondragon*, or any of the 400+ co-ops on this list: https://www.usworker.coop/directory/ don't exist?"
The difference is you don't shoot someone unless they're an immediate danger, and if you're in immediate danger, you don't have 45 minutes to wait for someone to come up on acid.
Love my government-sanctioned anarchy!
Carry vs transport varies by state, I believe but if it's in a locked case and unloaded, I think that counts as transport in most cases.
Honestly, when you're talking about getting as big as Destiny, you don't even have to be good at video games. Hasan's not great at video games, but he has 16k (ie makes a fuck ton of money) subscribers because he's entertaining. He mostly just talks about politics and memes and watches reality TV. He plays games for fun, but his audience drops off significantly when he switches over to gaming, generally.
Destroying ecosystems is still pretty fucked.
You're clearly misreading the post.