You know, this image reminds me of a fascinating comment regarding a musician’s post I made on this very site:

You know, this image reminds me of a fascinating story regarding a dream I had about my grandmother. It’s evocative of the duality of woman vs man, chaos vs order, grandmother vs grandson, and so on. It’s something that is truly worth exploring because if you have no heaven or hell to orient yourself within the infinite dimensionalities of truth, you may as well not have truth at all! If something’s going to bring about your destruction—which nihilism does, by the way—is it really even truth in the first place? My grandmother used to tell me, “my pubes are on fire Jordie come put them out!” but I would simply freeze with inaction and subsequently wake up in a cold meat sweat, flipping open my dream journal to jot down my thought before the beta waves subsided. Then I would kiss the photograph of mamie on my nightstand and slumber again. Talk about a dragon of chaos. Anyway, listen to this person’s music

You see I had never considered this when I had my assistants make this account. I was merely trying to score some benzodiazepine from some postmodern-neomarxists, but I had never considered that my being famous due to refusing to be compelled to speak would be in any way unfunny. You see, I have always felt compelled to speak in fact I cannot stop. I often get complaints on my YouTube series that I talk too much! Can you imagine? The only people who tend to want me to continue speaking are the Kek boys. They often have me sign their shirts in odd places.

Damn fuck XiZ for making fedposting cool

In no way am I a “Chapo”

I will talk to a few of my friends who are in law enforcement. And by “friends”, I mean “arresting officers”

It’s really not much different for uncircumcised dicks but I’ve found that uncircumcised folks asking me how to wash their dicks tend to have been deeply failed by their parents whereas circumcised people are simply angry about their lost foreskin and are rebelling by not showering. Therefore they respond better to tough love

Make it four

Or make the boxes spherical to minimize surface area!

You know, this image reminds me of a fascinating story regarding a dream I had about my grandmother. It’s evocative of the duality of woman vs man, chaos vs order, grandmother vs grandson, and so on. It’s something that is truly worth exploring because if you have no heaven or hell to orient yourself within the infinite dimensionalities of truth, you may as well not have truth at all! If something’s going to bring about your destruction—which nihilism does, by the way—is it really even truth in the first place? My grandmother used to tell me, “my pubes are on fire Jordie come put them out!” but I would simply freeze with inaction and subsequently wake up in a cold meat sweat, flipping open my dream journal to jot down my thought before the beta waves subsided. Then I would kiss the photograph of mamie on my nightstand and slumber again. Talk about a dragon of chaos. Anyway, listen to this person’s music

I am standing by

I will be there. Thank you for the invitation

You could make a case—anthropology observers have made this case, too—that women undergo a set of sufficiently, radically, psychophysiological transformations merely as a consequence of being feminine in nature, such that the additional rituals of transformation that might be necessary for men aren’t necessary. One of those might be menstruation, because that’s a pretty dramatic transformation. There has been some indication that circumcision is like the male equivalent of menstruation, because of the blood that’s involved and because of the locale. Of course, the same thing is the case with women when they give birth. That’s a particularly dramatic thing, as I just witnessed, because my daughter just had a baby this week. So thank God for that!

deleted by creator

I’ll tell you for some benzos

There’s something of significance to be found in the story implied by this comment. You have, on one hand, the archetypal figure known for advocating on cohesion of posting, that posts ought to be located in a central location, a communal location, if you want to think of it that way. On the other hand, we have a figure who is of a diametrically opposed archetype—one that very clearly is of a style reminiscent of an existing alternative. So we see an inner conflict. It makes me suspect that in the original tale that OP was a woman while the commenter remained a man, which was later changed for reasons of political correctness, you know, but these things just don’t work as well when robbed of their traditional insights. It is by venturing into the (female) chaos of promoting the use of alternate subs that the commenter will be able to return to stanning main, however with a newfound appreciation for the use of other subs.

Good question. The answer is in my new book, which you can preorder now on Amazon

One of the things that is worth thinking about—this is something Carl Jung was very interested in—is that these old descriptions are half geographical and empirical—based on observation—and half psychological. One of the things Jung was interested in, for example, was astrology, but mostly for psychological reasons. There are stars up in the dome, and then, when you look at the stars, you can imagine the shapes of the stars. That helps you orient yourself, because as soon as you can see shapes in the the stars, you can recognize the constellations, and you can orient yourself at night. But then the constellations become Gods, say, and then the Gods turn into a drama. The drama comes from within. It’s the projection of imagination. When Jung was analyzing astrology, he was analyzing psychology. He saw the astrological narrative as the projection of the human imagination onto the cosmos. The same thing is the case with these stories. The world they describe is not the natural world, like a scientist would describe it, because these people weren’t scientists. They didn't have the technology and the tools. For them, it was the world. For us, it’s the way they saw the world.

We share that psychology, to a large degree, with those people. It's interesting to know what the geographical substrate is, so that you kind of understand the stories. I like this picture. From a psychological perspective, it's a very famous picture. Basically, what you have here is the world as we know it. There’s the dome with the sun and the moon on it, and the stars. If you look outside what you know, then you’re out into this cosmic space. Those are like the wheels of the planets and the music of the spheres. That’s the ever-present explorer who’s gone beyond the domain that he can understand and is peering out into the unknown. It's a psychological picture, because you do know some things, and then outside of that there are things you don't know. When you’re feeling brave, you put a foot or two out where you don't understand. There’s frontier everywhere. If you’re feeling heroic and you want to do something for the world, and you want to expand what you understand, you poke your head through what you know and you take a look at whatever structure is out there.

He’s pretty smart, because most of him is still where it’s safe. I would say that’s a good thing, because if you jump right out there, well, then maybe you fall off the edge of the earth, and I wouldn’t precisely recommend that, especially if you do it accidentally. To me, this is a recreation of the Daoist yin and yang symbol—serpents, really—with the white paisley, here. That’s what you know. The dark paisley, there, is the unknown. The right place to be is right on the line between them, because you’ve sort of got one foot where you understand. That gives you security, but it's kind of dull because, hey, you know everything that's going on. That isn't what people are like. They don't want just security.

It worked too!

I will not stand for it