There’s something of significance to be found in the story implied by this comment. You have, on one hand, the archetypal figure known for advocating on cohesion of posting, that posts ought to be located in a central location, a communal location, if you want to think of it that way. On the other hand, we have a figure who is of a diametrically opposed archetype—one that very clearly is of a style reminiscent of an existing alternative. So we see an inner conflict. It makes me suspect that in the original tale that OP was a woman while the commenter remained a man, which was later changed for reasons of political correctness, you know, but these things just don’t work as well when robbed of their traditional insights. It is by venturing into the (female) chaos of promoting the use of alternate subs that the commenter will be able to return to stanning main, however with a newfound appreciation for the use of other subs.