Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

This was quite literally the law in USSR under Stalin

Removed by mod

Did you read the Lenin article in it's entirety?

It is a reasonably short one

That will provide your answer

Removed by mod

Never forget, when NATO began bombing Libya these trotskyites wrote this about Colonel Ghadaffi to demobilise and demoralise the anti-imperialist movement by claiming him to be a Tyrant, instead of an upright, noble leader that funded proletarian and national liberation movements all over the globe and built Libya to be the most successful country in Africa.

Had Ghadaffi live he would've used Libyan gold to create a Gold backed Pan African dina currency. For the first time the African continent would've been lifted off it's knees from the long shadow of colonialism. Clinton and (however small a part) Socialist Worker took this from them.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/12659

He claimed to be a champion of the oppressed but, says Phil Marfleet, the Libyan leader was a tyrant whose policies increasingly mirrored those of the states he said he opposed

Muammar Gaddafi was always strong on radical rhetoric. He said he supported “the people” and “revolution”. He claimed to oppose imperialism and unconditionally backed the Palestinians. In the 1970s and 1980s these repeated messages seduced many on the left internationally and Gaddafi was able to cultivate the image of an intransigent Arab nationalist who supported struggles for change worldwide.

He was in fact a ruthless dictator who crushed every form of dissent in Libya and proved an unreliable ally for most of the international causes he claimed to support.

https://socialistworker.co.uk/features/the-myth-of-gaddafi-the-radical/

It is only fitting this group of trots are running a "Marxist festival" with social-democrat Jeremy Corbyn, Epstein associate Noam Chomsky, Adam Tooze (a straight up bourgeois economist) and David Harvey who once said :

capitalism must not be overthrown because millions of people will starve.

but unless you’re in the middle of a protracted peoples war, you sound like you’re larping.

Owning guns is larping. You should only buy them when the actual Proletarian civil war starts.

To do so prior is a larp.

Also the us army occupied both Iraq and Afghanistan? They did it, they murdered thousands and could’ve continued to do so for years to come.

It took US 8$ trillion, many of their own soldiers dead, complete ruination of US empire to replace the Taliban with the Taliban

If a civil war started in US the reactionaries would not be shooting faceless, dehumanised arabs but their own family and countrymen. Most of the army would go over to the Proletariat in such a situation

Because Marx said revolution was right around the corner?

It is. Capitalism started in 1648 in England as the utmost you could give generosity to the porkies and by 1871 Proletarians were already waging class war against their system and by 1945 a 1/5 of the globe was a Proletarian Dictatorship. Add to this the US dollar is going down the shitter and will shortly be worth nothing with Xi Jinping stating : "“Right now there are changes – the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years – and we are the ones driving these changes together,”

If you truly believe in “under no pretext” then go start a left wing militia and hunt fascists - That is what the arms are for.

Left adventurism.

I hope you remain ideologically consistent and take this same stance the next time theres a school shooting.

I will state this after the 10,000th school shooting

If not wanting kids murdered makes me a democrat, then call me Joe Biden.

I knew it lol. You one of the guys that shilled for the social-fascists AOC and Bomber Bernie ?

Stop larping and either support gun control and initiate a protracted peoples war, this is just cringe

Never will I stop larping, never will I support gun control

If you're worried about school shootings you should join a communist party to overturn a pathologically psychopathic mode of production that produces this phenomena of mass shooting seen in hyper individualist - in such a society everyone be armed to maintain the people's army anyway

But (non communist) leftists don't, they whine about gun control, demand guns be taken and vote for the imperialist Democrat party by insisting it's a "necessary compromise"

The whole Marx quote about not surrendering guns has become an idealistic meme.

The US Army couldn't even occupy Iraq or Afghanistan without getting chased out by men wearing sandals, brandishing ak47s whilst the US army did some of the most horrendous bombings and indiscriminate civilian killings

An actual nazi uprising and the kind of mass murder seen in Nazi Germany, Indonesia 1965 etc could never happen.

Indonesian Communist Party was the largest Communist Party in the world (outside of China) in 1965. The wholesale mass murder and genocide of practically every communist, socialist and trade unionist in 1965 could never happen in USA due to the access of weapons.

And any whining about "the Army has way more sophisticated weapons" falls flat on it's face with 20th century insurgencies and wars of a technologically advanced imperialism versus proletarians waging class war (Russia 1918-1924, Korea 1950-53, China til 1949, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Houthis in Yemen, Syria etc)

but the next school shooting is.

From my cold dead hands, Democrat.

US is a fascinating place. They essentially gaslight themselves into positions then hope their gaslighting comes true.

Intellectual property is the last bastion of imperialist rentier parasitism

You cannot be more parasitic than demand rent from digital information. The trend to the value of 0 of information speaks volumes. Even people that play video games and know how to easily pirate will pay additional for the service (friend list/trophies/saved games etc)

China's recent dynamism has come from little care toward property rights