What_Religion_R_They [none/use name]

  • 208 Posts
  • 1.85K Comments
Joined 4 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 5th, 2020

help-circle



  • Some things that jumped out to me:

    There appeared to be lingering disagreement over whether Israel would have the right to strike Hezbollah if it believed the militants had violated the agreement, something Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insisted was part of the deal but which Lebanese and Hezbollah officials have rejected.

    and

    Hezbollah has said it accepts the proposal, but a senior official with the group said Tuesday it had not seen the agreement in its final form.

    “After reviewing the agreement signed by the enemy government, we will see if there is a match between what we stated and what was agreed upon by the Lebanese officials,” Mahmoud Qamati, deputy chair of Hezbollah’s political council, told the Al Jazeera news network.

    “We want an end to the aggression, of course, but not at the expense of the sovereignty of the state,” he said, referring to Israel’s demand for freedom of action. “Any violation of sovereignty is refused.”










  • Russia did not support the UN Security Council a resolution prepared by the United Kingdom and Sierra Leone on Sudan because of London’s attempt to leave the opportunity for itself to interfere in the affairs of this country and attempt political and social engineering. This was announced by the first Deputy Permanent Representative of Russia to the UN Dmitry Polyansky.

    "Throughout their work on this project, they have spent a lot of effort to remove from the text the mention of the legitimate authorities of the Sudan in the most key places. Their position is absurd and unacceptable, including in the light of the fact that the Government of the Sudan represents its country in international organizations, exercises control over the main processes in the state, distributes humanitarian assistance, and the Sudanese themselves seek refuge and protection in the regions controlled by the Government. We cannot qualify such a position as anything other than leaving for themselves the opportunity to interfere in the affairs of the Sudan and further political and social engineering, as it was in the spring of 2023, when attempts to advance the decisions that are not supported by the country's people laid the prerequisites for the tragedy that unfolded in Sudan," the diplomat underlined.

    [...]

    "The main problem with the British project is that it has a false understanding of who is responsible for protecting the Sudanese civilian population, the control and security of the borders of that State, who can decide to invite foreign forces to the Sudan. Who, in the end, should be inter-inclused by UN officials in order to solve emerging problems and plan assistance."

    https://tass.ru/politika/22434783

    Whatever he claims goes counter to what the West claim that Russia is supporting. The demands here are for the Sudanese government to take the lead, whereas Russia is seen as supporting the RSF.


    Speaking at the Economic Conference in Port Sudan, al-Burhan criticized the resolution for not acknowledging the role of foreign actors in supplying weapons to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF).

    [...]

    The army chief reiterated his commitment to finding a solution internally and rejecting external interference. He declared that victory against the RSF was imminent, and the war was turning to favour the SAF.

    https://sudantribune.com/article293556/