We had some bugs that we didn’t have room on the table for. We kept them for supper and I mixed some dill, cucumber, spring onion and mayo with some Dijon mustard, lemon juice and seasoning for delicious open sandwiches, in a Swedish Aussie mix.
I think it's going to depend on if he's just about deregulation. The over regulation was causing problems. Inflation is still ridiculous. The priority is to stabilize and allow trade internally and internationally.
I think it's more a political gamble at this point. For instance, winding back trial periods from 3 months to 8 months will only affect a small sunset of workers, so it's not a huge economic risk, but it might give businesses more certainty to hire. So it's not completely loopy, but if it's all deregulation and no plan, with no future, better regulation, it'll become more of a banana Republic.
Just a heads up that liftoff no longer works as it has not had necessary upgrades to be co patibke with 0.19
It is now end of life unless the dev returns. There have been no updates for a few months.
Do that have obligations not to. What I mean, is that for doctors, psychs, dentists etc there is an obligation of privacy. Do pharmacists not have that? Do corporate healthcare providers not have that? If they do, have they just created billions in damaging lawsuits?
Lol, they know. They also know they are required to serve the option, but you are not required to not block it.
Yeah, Australians are such bigots. I hate them all.
It could be her bowing out as they fired her Co star for voicing support for Palestine. It was called anti semitic but from what I've seen it wasn't.
It could also be that Ortega has made supportive comments and prefers to walk than be pushed. Or was pushed, but has better PR.
Timing is certainly odd.
To be fair, she was already doing well from TV, and scream was a big win, but Wednesday made her a household name. If it really was scheduling, it still makes sense. The timing of the announcement makes that super unlikely.
Not necessarily. The passport office is publicly owned and we pay some of the highest fees for passports.
The nbn is publicly owned but seeks to make a profit.
Anything that is government owned is paid for by us all anyway, through taxes. That's not necessarily a bad thing. But, when things are more expensive to use, but not used by all, it's fairer. However for essential service, spreading the cost by how much people can afford is also good.
It's not a case of public good, private badz but there is nuance and pros and cons.
Privatizing infrastructure is not necessarily a bad thing. Competition in telecoms is a net benefit to society. However, there needs to be minimum service standards.
For instance, with telephones, there was redundancy for electric failure. However with nbn there isn't. It's especially a problem where you have outages like Optus where someone might rely on them for phone, internet and mobile service, in face being incentivised to do so. At least with mobile, there is redundancy of 000 calls through any network. We should look at how we can do similar. For instance, in the event of an Internet outage, a code could be entered into eftpos terminals to accept offline payments for 24 hours or similar. Sure, there is a higher risk of fraud for this period, but that's better than no commerce.
We don't need to try and hang on to cash. We need redundancy. Whether that is by design with legislation, or making communications providers liable for losses for outage is the question. Obviously they will pass on any costs so the question is also which will be better for society and which will cost the least.
It's ok. They are just doing what's necessary to keep our data safe.
Mine in Sydney too.
Yes, but that's partly my point. The teens and adults that are fans are only fans due to playing as kids, likely due to marketing to them. That's not to say any game is good or bad, but to me it's a sign of immaturity to bring it up. I'd have similar red flags with someone discussing non kid hobbies if I showed little interest. If someone wants to chat football or handbags, I'd equally want out. It's a know your audience problem. If have no problem dating a Pokemon fan and I'd probably take up the game to play with them. My issue is being so into it it's all you want to talk about on a first date. It would strine me as immature.
If we were discussing hobbies and they briefly brought it up, that wouldn't be a red flag, per se.
Sounds like more steps than getting high quality audio in an album format but good to know the option exists.
Yes, a waterproof one for swimming. It's life changing, but it means having to scour the seven seas for music as I don't buy CDs or have an mp3 collection any more.
It's a show marketed at kids. Manu adults like it as they grew up with it. Manu adultsike the games, but those unfamiliar are not starting as adults.
For me, it's not about having a childhood hobby you still enjoy. It's about not having the social awareness to not being it up on a first date. In context, sure, why not, if you walked by a poster or kid playing and it became a topic of conversation. But as a topic of conversation whose purpose is to get to know each other, I'd be worried they never matured.
I still.play video games from my childhood almost daily, when I get the chance. I won't chat about combos or new sf6 characters with strangers or a first date.
Red flag for me. I'm all for people having hobbies, but bringing up niche hobbies from childhood would not be great. I'm sure 2 fans would get along great. However, it would be odd to bring up with another adult who is not a known fan.
Uncharted. Gone back to play the first. It’s fun, but a bit basic. It’s interesting to see the things they are trying out that later end up in the last of us.
It also could mean that the teal independent seats becomes more permanent as the libs cement their status as a racist party among those that used to consider them.
Smoke salmon gently fried is delicious. Gently heated inside a pie, or similar is fine and can be delicious.