perfect, thanks!

Link to original? This would make a good template.

Dang, this makes much more sense than the dozens of exceptions I have been accumulating.

They're asking both. The headline is addressing the "should" question, but the article goes a little deeper.

The survey ... also finds a rare point of partisan agreement when it comes to the importance of all qualified citizens being allowed to vote. However, there are sizable differences in confidence about whether this is happening – and even wider differences in confidence in whether people not legally qualified to vote are prevented from voting.

Nearly all Americans (94%) – including 95% of both Republicans and Democrats – say it is important that people who are legally qualified to vote are able to cast a ballot, with 82% saying it is very important.

A large majority of Republicans (87%) are at least somewhat confident that legally qualified people are able to vote if they want to, including 54% who are very confident this is the case. Democrats express less confidence: 69% say they are at least somewhat confident that legally qualified people are able to cast a ballot, and just 28% say they are very confident in this.

Me too, comrade. Sadly, he got the vaccine and probably has access to the same expensive antibody juice that Trump got, just in case.

There is no justice in this country :(

As much as I hate many aspects of English—especially the fact that it's not phonetic—the fact that most of our words have neutral gender is a very strong plus. There is absolutely no reason that I should have to remember that "agua" has masculine gender, despite ending with "a", but inexplicably uses a feminine definite article.

Ain't no taste like the taste of your own medicine.

If you give yourself constipation it'll take even longer to shit when you finally do work again. It's a win-win.

I don't think this is particularly related to your question, but I remember being introduced to a lot of scientific™ fuckery in this episode of Citations Needed:

Episode 90: How Western Media's False Binary Between "Science" and Indigenous Rights is Used to Erase Native People

Links for the lazy (myself included):

• Lenin: The Right of Nations to Self-Determination
• Lenin: The Discussion of Self-Determination Summed Up
• Stalin: Marxism and the National Question

line go up when nothing get done

I had a landlord that had to be harassed to get things fixed. By the end of my lease they wanted to raise my rent by $300. I said "nope". But the sad thing is that was one of the cheapest places to live I could find without subleasing.

Meanwhile, the college and its (often wealthy) students are clearly the main sources of revenue for the surrounding area, so naturally the city as a whole looks poorly maintained.

Hank is a lib, but I respect his willingness to say "I don't have an answer" as opposed to the usual liberal take of "just vote harder".

Shhh, logic is not taught in schools. You might scare them!

And then the US switched to a professional military model with a heavy emphasis on bombardment. And liberals congratulated themselves on having solved war.

Yes, but doesn't that one basically end with Volume 1?

This sort of exists already. There are communities for the various tendencies and you can post questions to the perspective you'd like answered. The same thing also exists on the Discord, if you prefer single-threaded conversations for some reason.

But I guess it could be useful to have a single community for all theory-related discussions. [Edit: which does actually exist in the form of !books@hexbear.net]

Excuse me but I'm a jUdeO ChRisTiaN

Trick the professional class into supporting revolution.

No we're not trying to establish socialism, we just want everybody to use metric, and this is much cheaper than trying to get it through congress.

The world might be burning, but at least the Dow is down 100 points.