• determinism2 [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have a PhD in nuclear physics from a top 10 science guy university in the world, and I don't believe nuclear armageddon is a problem. And I'm also not interested in discussing it (just so that no one comes with bs talking points, I've seen enough). I'm just saying this so that you don't stumble on your own delusional bubble too much.

    You don't believe in science. You believe in TV. You haven't read a single peer reviewed paper on the matter, let alone papers that have a different point of view. So spare me your condescending bullshit.

    Now go ahead and downvote me so that you can sleep better at night after having excluded me, the infidel. Just remember that many people out there have degrees, educated and read 100 times on the matter than you and disagree with your delusions on the matter. Enjoy four faith in TV.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Is that a copypasta?

      EDIT: Shit, it is. Worse, I saw the pasta being made, fresh, and lost track because there was so much of it. failure

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          It's here, but it's been moderated and cleaned up a bit. I admit I baited the Very Mature and Very Important Scientist Doing Climate Denial Science for a while in it.

          https://hexbear.net/post/355380?scrollToComments=false

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              When the Very Mature Climate Denial Nuclear Scientist rages about "gifs" and uses boomer tier emojis to rage about them grill-broke

      • keepcarrot [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's a copy paste from another thread where someone says he has a phd in particle physics and says this about climate change

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Is that the same self described particle physicist that claims to have credientials ready to show (that somehow have something to do with climate change authority while also saying ecology is not a real scientific field) but demands a wager under dubious win conditions in Le Bitcoin before showing any evidence?

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Science is about demanding thousands of dollars in internet funny money before presenting claimed credentials.

              • keepcarrot [she/her]
                ·
                1 year ago

                I simply wouldn't claim intimate knowledge of scientific consensus in a field I don't study extensively