Image is from @Parsani@hexbear.net, who got it from @RNAi@hexbear.net, who got it from Discord.


Thread update: Prigozhin's fucking dead.

rip-bozo


The BRICS summit will begin on Tuesday and end on Thursday, with various world leaders, politicians, and representatives meeting in Johannesburg, South Africa.

America's anxiety about the summit has been obvious. They have been complicating the event by pushing for the arrest warrant for Putin to be upheld if he steps foot in the country. While this is a remarkably dangerous and unhinged thing to do - even by America's standards - to the leader of a nuclear superpower who could end the world within an hour, it does betray their desperation. Unfortunately, for those of us who wanted to see Putin surrounded by an army of security guards fending off people holding handcuffs, he has sent his Foreign Minister, Lavrov, in his place. Additionally, America has likely been spreading rumors about the lack of interest in gaining new members in the organization.

With apparently 20 countries formally seeking membership and another 20 informally doing so, the bloc has been elevated, whether they like it or not, to the position of the international vanguard of the non-western world. It is extremely important to say that this is not the same as it becoming an anti-American bloc, and many of them (including original members Brazil and India) wish to keep a friendly relationship with the United States. Nonetheless, with the United States' policy of "if you are not with us, you are against us," and as the US seeks to weaken China, in coming years many of them might find themselves under hostile pressure.

BRICS has to try and solve many problems if they are going to chip away at America's stranglehold of the world economy. These problems - like mitigating the dollar's status as a global reserve currency, and America's dominant role in the world economy - are extremely complicated, and will takes years, even decades, to be overcome. Therefore, one should temper their expectations and excitement for this summit. It took tens of millions of deaths in cataclysmic wars, and then several more decades, for America to reach its current position. I see no reason to believe why its downfall will be any less bloody and elongated.

To end on a less depressing note, I've been searching for appropriate anagrams given the list of countries that seek to join BRICS. Obviously not all of them will make it in, but even so. The best I've come up with is HIBISCUS EMANCIPATES BBBBKKRVV.

(also, "bulletins and news discussion" can be rearranged to "libidinous newsstands uncles".)


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

This week's first update is here in the comments.

This week's second update is here in the comments.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • SoyViking [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This item is of little consequence but it speaks to the sorry state of the western left:

    The Red-Greens, the farthest left you can get in Danish parliamentary politics, has picked a new political leader as the previous leader is resigning due to term limits and maternity leave. The new leader is Pelle Dragsted and you can say lots of positive things about him, he's well-spoken and clearly intelligent. In his youth he was a communist, he beat up Nazis, got arrested several times and was imprisoned for "vandalizing" a refugee detention center.

    But then he grew older and softer and transformed into a "real politician". He is seen as one of the chief architects behind the Red-Greens' rightwards turn towards "being responsible" and "making compromises". This includes turning the traditionally anti-militarist party from opponents of NATO and onto a "there's no alternative to NATO and we're too spineless to hold an unpopular opinion"-line. He is also so cucked that he's publicly regretting his antifascist past

    I was angry at capitalism, the police and the Nazis. I also took part in things I today think were stupid. It was an environment on which violence was accepted because you thought it was a kind of self defense against for instance the neo-nazis.

    But as I was saying: I see things different today. I still want to change the world and make Denmark a fairer place but only with peaceful and democratic means.

    In the press conference today he made the following statement that perfectly encapsulates how opportunism and ideological decay had turned the western left into a bunch of impotent reactionary succdems:

    I love Denmark. I love the society and the form of society we have developed for the last century.

    The good Vladimir Ilyich would have had him shot.

    • tuga [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But as I was saying: I see things different today. I still want to change the world and make Denmark a fairer place but only with peaceful and democratic means.

      I love Denmark. I love the society and the form of society (josus-stalin ) we have developed for the last century.

      You seem completely right on this guy being an opportunist, and you layed out exactly why by revealing that party's position on NATO, but these statements shouldn't be unexpected from anyone seeking to have any real power because at the end of the day in this current context no one, including the working class, is going to think of you as someone worth giving power to if you're not "peaceful and democratic" and don't "love your country" (although the later part about the "form of society" is sus), these are both statements that can have positive connotations if you're a socialist even if the online left insists on reading them as dogwhistles.

      Declarations of the opposite will get you read, probably correctly, as unserious by the same people you're supposed to want a better life for.

      • SoyViking [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I get why you have to say the right sound bites to be perceived as serious but unless you try to load a liberatory message into them you end up perpetuating the ideological status quo. Every Danish politician could have said that last line and the public is going to read it as yet another affirmation of the idea that they live in the best country in the world and that the status quo is fundamentally good.