Image is of President Hakainde Hichilema and President Xi Jinping on September 15th, from this article.
Zambia is a country of 20 million people, located in southern Africa. Breaking free from British rule in the 1960s, the new government was a one party state ruled by the socialist UNIP party with its leader Kenneth Kaunda, who was a strong supporter of the Non-Aligned Movement (and was its chairman from 1970-73). Its economy has been and remains characterised by copper exports - it is the second-largest copper exporter in Africa - and the economy deeply struggled in the 1970s due to the price of copper plunging. After the fall of the USSR, and due to violent protests, Kaunda stepped down and instituted a multiparty democracy, which has been maintained without (successful) coups to this day, though there are warnings by the leader that some are plotting a coup, given the trend right now.AA
Earlier this year, in June, Zambia struck a deal to restructure the $6.3 billion in debt that they are burdened with, of which China is the single largest creditor.Reuters Though he has typically been more West-friendly, last week, President Hichilema traveled to China for two days, meeting with various companies, and Xi Jinping himself. They elevated their relationship to that of a comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.Xinhua He and Xi have agreed to the increased use of local currencies in trade.BB
Hichilema said Zambia thanks China for supporting the African Union's entry into the G20 and China's positive role in resolving the Zambian debt issue. The Zambian side abides by the one-China principle, highly appreciates the guiding philosophy and principles of Chinese modernization, and hopes to learn from China's development experience.
Hichilema has also said:AN
"We can do more, faster, because the needs are tremendous in Zambia. I heard some of the solutions are here. All we need to do is to combine the two together."
Check out @Othello@hexbear.net's discussion of The Wretched of the Earth!
The Country of the Week is Singapore! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.
Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.
The news summary for last week is here!
Links and Stuff
The bulletins site is down.
Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict
Add to the above list if you can.
Resources For Understanding The War
Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.
Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.
Telegram Channels
Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.
Pro-Russian
https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.
Pro-Ukraine
Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.
Last week's discussion post.
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/U7MgT
Forbes own Axehole Dave is back with some fresh cope but with a special side dish of dunking on the French.
Long story short, "armored" does not belong in the same sentence as "reconnaissance". Also the French are taking Ls in their trash war gear alongside the U.S, U.K, and the krauts.
Nothing new here. Ukrainians are still so strapped for artillery they're having to cobble together viable replacements for their dwindling forward artillery support.
Pretty normal for both sides when you're basically taking potshots at random against each other.
Aka the counteroffensive has failed and all those shiny western wunderweapons fail when used as designed therefore Ukrainian forces have to adapt them to the material conditions of the battlefield.
And then had them get driven into minefields for the loss.
"lightweight reconnaissance vehicle" with a fucking 105mm turret. It's a shitty glass cannon tank destroyer on wheels by design best used for ambushing. Recon is the domain of light infantry because it's easier for a human to hide than a fucking tank with toilet paper armor.
See last paragraph.
Told ya. Literally designed for ambushing shit.
Lmao you don't fuckin say.
Translation: aerial drone and foot recon is all that's needed in modern war.
Also fuck you axehole, those "inexperienced Ukrainian officers" were told to do NATO tactics regardless of what reality dictates.
I think I remember talking about this before specifically about how suicidal it was driving these shit things into minefields a few weeks back.
Wait no I might be thinking of those shitty kraut tanks that also suck.
Lmao
(To be sure, the French vehicle is a solid shooter. When the first AMX-10RCs began arriving in Ukraine back in the spring, then-defense minister Oleksii Reznikov described the vehicles as “sniper rifle[s] ... on fast wheels.”
Toilet paper tank
See, adapting poorly designed tech for alternative purposes better suited for them.
Axehole Dave gotta do some "muh both sides" while also listing the ages of Russian tech to still cope at the fact that modern tanks are being relegated to being used as self-propelled artillery systems.
No shit, solid entrenched defenses are fucking hard to break through for anyone.
Aka closer to the frontline.
They aren't recon vehicles, goddamnit!
You know who anticipated the need for large amounts of self-propelled artillery? This obscure little country called the fucking Soviet Union, which developed a whole lot of SP artillery systems, like the 2S1 Gvozdika (over 10k manufactured) & 2S3 Akatsiya (around 4k). If only Ukraine was a former Soviet republic or something...
I actually decided to check this, since I assumed they must have inherited a whole lot of stuff from the Soviets, and was wondering what had happened to all of it:
Wikipedia also adds a 7,000 figure for other non-tank armored vehicles (APCs and IFVs and so on, I assume these self-propelled guns would be counted towards that as well), although I'm not sure what the source for that is.
They actually do still have around 300 of the 2S1, and another 300 of the 2S3, but I assume they probably had a lot more in 1991, given that the Soviets made over 10k of the 2S1, and it was even designed in fucking Kharkov, so they must have inherited some of the factories and tooling for it too.
So, uh, yeah, don't do capitalism kids, it's bad for both your health and your supply of tanks. Ukraine probably got rid of more military equipment in the 90s than they've received as military aid now. And yeah, sure, it was Cold War Soviet vintage, but if you're going to be using your tanks as improvised artillery anyway, what would you rather have - a hundred fancy Western tanks that weight like 60 tons and burn a whole lot of fuel, or a thousand economical Soviet ones? (and I don't think they've even gotten that many modern Western tanks, most of the heavier military aid has just been upgraded Soviet equipment anyway! stuff that Ukraine would already have if it hadn't disappeared in what I assume were various Lord of War-esque shenanigans)
Still wild to see attitudes of military top brass hasn't changed that much from world war fucking 1. All this talk of breaking the frontline and restarting mobile warfare running right into the reality that modern defensive technology and tactics overwhelmingly favour the defender. You can brag all you want about your fantastic western wunderwaffen champing at the bit to do HoI4 eastern front style encirclements, but you still gotta get through minefields, barbed wire, anti-tank obstacles, drone guided artillery, airstrikes, etc first, and western military minds have 0 experience in that. All NATO knows is colonial oppression campaigns, genocide, and airstriking farmers and shepherds
Hey aluminum armor is fantastic, just look how well the Bradleys are holding up over there