Image is of President Hakainde Hichilema and President Xi Jinping on September 15th, from this article.


Zambia is a country of 20 million people, located in southern Africa. Breaking free from British rule in the 1960s, the new government was a one party state ruled by the socialist UNIP party with its leader Kenneth Kaunda, who was a strong supporter of the Non-Aligned Movement (and was its chairman from 1970-73). Its economy has been and remains characterised by copper exports - it is the second-largest copper exporter in Africa - and the economy deeply struggled in the 1970s due to the price of copper plunging. After the fall of the USSR, and due to violent protests, Kaunda stepped down and instituted a multiparty democracy, which has been maintained without (successful) coups to this day, though there are warnings by the leader that some are plotting a coup, given the trend right now.AA

Earlier this year, in June, Zambia struck a deal to restructure the $6.3 billion in debt that they are burdened with, of which China is the single largest creditor.Reuters Though he has typically been more West-friendly, last week, President Hichilema traveled to China for two days, meeting with various companies, and Xi Jinping himself. They elevated their relationship to that of a comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership.Xinhua He and Xi have agreed to the increased use of local currencies in trade.BB

Hichilema said Zambia thanks China for supporting the African Union's entry into the G20 and China's positive role in resolving the Zambian debt issue. The Zambian side abides by the one-China principle, highly appreciates the guiding philosophy and principles of Chinese modernization, and hopes to learn from China's development experience.

Hichilema has also said:AN

"We can do more, faster, because the needs are tremendous in Zambia. I heard some of the solutions are here. All we need to do is to combine the two together."


Check out @Othello@hexbear.net's discussion of The Wretched of the Earth!

The Country of the Week is Singapore! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.


Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

The news summary for last week is here!

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://ghostarchive.org/archive/U7MgT

    Forbes own Axehole Dave is back with some fresh cope but with a special side dish of dunking on the French.

    Ukraine’s French Recon Vehicles Are Too Flimsy For Frontal Assaults, So The Marines Are Using Them As Artillery. By David Axe

    Long story short, "armored" does not belong in the same sentence as "reconnaissance". Also the French are taking Ls in their trash war gear alongside the U.S, U.K, and the krauts.

    The Ukrainian marine corps is using its French-made AMX-10RC reconnaissance vehicles as artillery, deploying them behind the front line and leisurely aiming their 105-millimeter guns at Russian positions

    Nothing new here. Ukrainians are still so strapped for artillery they're having to cobble together viable replacements for their dwindling forward artillery support.

    A video that appeared online last week depicts a platoon of AMX-10RCs firing their main guns from an open field in broad daylight, while a separate video from inside one of the vehicles underscores the crew’s unhurried attitude.

    It’s obvious the AMX-10RCs aren’t in much danger from return fire. They’re far enough from the enemy that they can shoot and scoot before anyone shoots back.

    Pretty normal for both sides when you're basically taking potshots at random against each other.

    This isn’t the role French firm GIAT designed the 15-ton, wheeled AMX-10RC for—nor is it the role French forces usually assign to the type. But barring a major breakthrough by Ukrainian marines onto open terrain—an unlikely contingency given where the marines are fighting—it might be all the four-person AMX-10RCs can handle.

    Aka the counteroffensive has failed and all those shiny western wunderweapons fail when used as designed therefore Ukrainian forces have to adapt them to the material conditions of the battlefield.

    Last winter, France pledged 40 AMX-10RCs to the Ukrainian war effort. The pledge came as Ukraine’s foreign allies were scouring their vehicle parks and warehouses for armored vehicles they quickly could donate.

    The United Kingdom offered Challenger 2 tanks; Germany pledged Leopard 2 and Leopard 1 tanks and Marder infantry fighting vehicles; the United States pledged M-1 tanks and M-2 and Stryker IFVs.

    And then had them get driven into minefields for the loss.

    France’s donation of AMX-10RCs stood out. The AMX-10RC isn’t a tank. It isn’t a fighting vehicle. No, it’s a lightweight reconnaissance vehicle. As designed, it operates in small groups, speeding ahead of the tanks and IFVs in order to probe enemy defenses.

    "lightweight reconnaissance vehicle" with a fucking 105mm turret. It's a shitty glass cannon tank destroyer on wheels by design best used for ambushing. Recon is the domain of light infantry because it's easier for a human to hide than a fucking tank with toilet paper armor.

    An AMX-10RC isn’t supposed to stand and fight; it’s supposed to sneak around, fire a few rounds, provoke a response, register enemy positions and then speed away. Which is why GIAT emphasized the vehicle’s speed and optics and deemphasized its firepower and armor protection.

    See last paragraph.

    The AMX-10RC has an accurate and effective main gun—but the gun lacks stabilization, meaning the vehicle must halt before shooting. However, the AMX-10RC’s greatest weakness is its thin aluminum armor, which offers the equivalent of just a few tens of millimeters of steel

    Told ya. Literally designed for ambushing shit.

    The problem, for the Ukrainian units that took ownership of the AMX-10RCs—the 37th Marine Brigade, for one—is that, early in their long-planned counteroffensive, which kicked off across southern Ukraine on June 4, they didn’t need ground reconnaissance vehicles. After a year of intensive drone surveillance, they knew where the Russians were.

    Lmao you don't fuckin say.

    Pre-counteroffensive aerial reconnaissance rendered moot the AMX-10RC’s primary function. But inexperienced Ukrainian officers, apparently keen to make use of all of their recently-donated Western equipment, deployed the AMX-10RCs, anyway.

    Translation: aerial drone and foot recon is all that's needed in modern war.

    Also fuck you axehole, those "inexperienced Ukrainian officers" were told to do NATO tactics regardless of what reality dictates.

    When the 37th Brigade and other units pushed across Russian minefields and pre-sighted artillery kill zones toward Velyka Novosilka in southern Ukraine’s Donetsk Oblast in early June, the AMX-10RCs were in the lead.

    The results were predictably tragic. At least two, and perhaps as many as four, of the AMX-10RCs were immobilized or destroyed. Russian forces captured one of the immobilized vehicles.

    I think I remember talking about this before specifically about how suicidal it was driving these shit things into minefields a few weeks back.

    The marines learned their lesson. “The guns are good, the observation devices are very good,” the major said of the AMX-10RCs. “But unfortunately, there is thin armor and it is impractical to use them in the front line (attack).”

    Wait no I might be thinking of those shitty kraut tanks that also suck.

    It should come as no surprise that, as the Ukrainian marines finally broke through Velyka Novosilka and fought their way south along the narrow Mokri Yaly River Valley—an effort that continues three months later—they led with T-80 tanks and British- and American-made armored trucks, and held back the AMX-10RCs.

    Lmao

    But it was unclear what the Ukrainians were doing with the surviving three dozen AMX-10RCs until the recent video depicted them in the indirect-fire role.

    (To be sure, the French vehicle is a solid shooter. When the first AMX-10RCs began arriving in Ukraine back in the spring, then-defense minister Oleksii Reznikov described the vehicles as “sniper rifle[s] ... on fast wheels.”

    Toilet paper tank

    The combination of precise day-night optics and a reliable main gun means an AMX-10RC crew reliably can hit targets a mile away or more. And that’s while shooting directly. Elevate the gun and shoot ballistically, and the maximum range is 4.5 miles.

    Don’t expect the same accuracy at that distance, of course. Firing from beyond visual range, an AMX-10RC functions as a kind of improvised, extra-survivable howitzer: aiming at target coordinates registered by drones or forward observers.

    See, adapting poorly designed tech for alternative purposes better suited for them.

    And it’s not alone. Those hundreds of 70-year-old T-54 and T-55 and 60-year-old T-62 tanks the Kremlin has pulled out of long-term storage and shipped to the front? They also are functioning as howitzers, respectively firing their 100-millimeter and 115-millimeter guns out to a distance of up to 10 miles. Ukraine’s Challenger 2 and Leopard 2 tanks are doing the same.

    Axehole Dave gotta do some "muh both sides" while also listing the ages of Russian tech to still cope at the fact that modern tanks are being relegated to being used as self-propelled artillery systems.

    Omnipresent drones, mines and anti-tank missile teams have made the Ukraine front line a very dangerous place for tanks and recon vehicles. So more and more, the Ukrainian and Russian armies are deploying their big-gun armored fighting vehicles—recon vehicles and tanks alike—as artillery. It’s a compromise that protects the vehicles without wasting their firepower.

    No shit, solid entrenched defenses are fucking hard to break through for anyone.

    “They make for an inefficient form of artillery,” analysts Jack Watling and Nick Reynolds wrote about the tank-howitzers in a recent study for the Royal United Services Institute in London. “Nevertheless, these engagements can often be made from positions that would not be viable for artillery.”

    Aka closer to the frontline.

    The AMX-10RC works just fine in this compromise role. Which is fortunate for the marine brigades operating the type. Because the only other mission the recon vehicles are good at—speedy reconnaissance—is irrelevant as long as the front line is so stiff and over-surveilled ... and there’s nothing for the vehicles to reconnoiter.

    They aren't recon vehicles, goddamnit!

    • Tervell [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ukrainians are still so strapped for artillery they're having to cobble together viable replacements for their dwindling forward artillery support

      You know who anticipated the need for large amounts of self-propelled artillery? This obscure little country called the fucking Soviet Union, which developed a whole lot of SP artillery systems, like the 2S1 Gvozdika (over 10k manufactured) & 2S3 Akatsiya (around 4k). If only Ukraine was a former Soviet republic or something...

      I actually decided to check this, since I assumed they must have inherited a whole lot of stuff from the Soviets, and was wondering what had happened to all of it:

      After the collapse of the Soviet Union, Ukraine inherited one of the largest armies in Europe. Its armed forces had 780,000 troops, 6,500 tanks, 1,100 combat aircraft, and more than 500 ships

      Wikipedia also adds a 7,000 figure for other non-tank armored vehicles (APCs and IFVs and so on, I assume these self-propelled guns would be counted towards that as well), although I'm not sure what the source for that is.

      At the beginning of 2013, the Ukrainian military had downsized compared to its Soviet predecessor, comprising 184,000 soldiers, roughly 700 tanks, 170 combat aircraft, and 22 warships

      They actually do still have around 300 of the 2S1, and another 300 of the 2S3, but I assume they probably had a lot more in 1991, given that the Soviets made over 10k of the 2S1, and it was even designed in fucking Kharkov, so they must have inherited some of the factories and tooling for it too.

      So, uh, yeah, don't do capitalism kids, it's bad for both your health and your supply of tanks. Ukraine probably got rid of more military equipment in the 90s than they've received as military aid now. And yeah, sure, it was Cold War Soviet vintage, but if you're going to be using your tanks as improvised artillery anyway, what would you rather have - a hundred fancy Western tanks that weight like 60 tons and burn a whole lot of fuel, or a thousand economical Soviet ones? (and I don't think they've even gotten that many modern Western tanks, most of the heavier military aid has just been upgraded Soviet equipment anyway! stuff that Ukraine would already have if it hadn't disappeared in what I assume were various Lord of War-esque shenanigans)

    • FALGSConaut [comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Still wild to see attitudes of military top brass hasn't changed that much from world war fucking 1. All this talk of breaking the frontline and restarting mobile warfare running right into the reality that modern defensive technology and tactics overwhelmingly favour the defender. You can brag all you want about your fantastic western wunderwaffen champing at the bit to do HoI4 eastern front style encirclements, but you still gotta get through minefields, barbed wire, anti-tank obstacles, drone guided artillery, airstrikes, etc first, and western military minds have 0 experience in that. All NATO knows is colonial oppression campaigns, genocide, and airstriking farmers and shepherds

      • egg1918 [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Hey aluminum armor is fantastic, just look how well the Bradleys are holding up over there