I was told landlords did a lot of work to earn their money? If he's clearly well enough to do such intense labor like owning property then he must be in good mental condition.
Its the same principle. Personally Id make second homes illegal ...it destroys communities and takes housing stock from people that actually need it, but hey ho. Thatcher fucked us as well selling off council houses.
The problem is your orginal statement. "Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like" would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.
Who the fuck wants racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-worker capitalist laws upheld?
'The rule of law' is a cloud of toxic farts youve been sniffing your whole life while the ruling class hang out on their mega yachts and in their towers (breaking any and all 'laws' they want)
all landlords should be given the choice between immediate execution and having their property expropriated, and having their property expropriated
Who the fuck wants racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-worker capitalist laws upheld?
Not me. Do you?
‘The rule of law’ is a cloud of toxic farts youve been sniffing your whole life while the ruling class hang out on their mega yachts and in their towers (breaking any and all ‘laws’ they want)
Totally agree.
all landlords should be given the choice between immediate execution and having their property expropriated, and having their property expropriated
Thats fine. Everything youve said has fuck all to do with everything Ive said...
U said "u can't just not want the law to be upheld in some situations" so his question "do u want racist, sexist, etc laws to be upheld" Is a relevant question I am curious abt ur answer btw because uve given 2 seperate answers
If your stance is the destruction of the state, then using or avoiding its legal system by whatever means necessary to further the project of undermining it is a coherent position.
You don't have some hot take. You have no idea what you're talking about. Literally no one here only wants renters to only take possession of their homes in special cases, nor do we give a fuck about laws that protect landlords.
Because I have reading comprehension I understand that you made am ambiguous statement. In my generosity I interpreted you as saying something much less dumb. If your take is that we need to obey the laws that benefit the rich and powerful because if we don't how are we going to enforce drunk driving or age of consent that's some real smooth brain shit.
So yeah sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt don't worry it won't happen again
this is because the Principle is "Inmaterial" , you can not touch it .
Wanna know how the Grownups call it ? "Superstructure"
and @GarbageShoot@hexbear.net he talked about Poop (hi hi). While you should not really touch it (ha ha ha) , if you want you could touch it.
thats because "Poop" is "Material", you can Touch it (and smell it even )
Show
all you can touch , we call "Base" .. and many discussions of the Grownup world are actually just the conflict beetween the "Ideal" (that you can not touch) and the "Real Shit" (that smells)
this is called "Dialektiks"
Get over yourself. I presented many actual arguments that you are here ignoring. There, I was just making a joke based on a popular adage ("Wish in one hand . . . ").
I think it was actually a devastating burn to talk down to someone so hard you could have said the same thing to a 5 year old and they'd get something out of the experience
As the guy who wrote “what good is principal” and forgot to come back for four days, garbage shoot’s post and your reply were perfect. Truly could not have hoped for better.
I was told landlords did a lot of work to earn their money? If he's clearly well enough to do such intense labor like owning property then he must be in good mental condition.
Removed by mod
Its funny when landlords get fucked over, actually
Totally agree. But I wouldnt like it if someone misled my parents like this and took the house they actually live in, so I dont like this.
This was a renter taking the house that they, the renter, lived in
Yes, where are you confused.
It was not depriving someone of ownership of the house they lived in but precisely the opposite of that, granting someone that ownership.
Yeah...take the landlord element out of it.
but then that would be a completely different situation. why would you expect people to feel the same way about a completely different situation?
Its the same principle. Personally Id make second homes illegal ...it destroys communities and takes housing stock from people that actually need it, but hey ho. Thatcher fucked us as well selling off council houses.
Now if you replace landlord with Jew, then think about it tankies
What if the world was made out of pudding
We could eat it.
He's a landlord, that wasn't the house he lived in...
Yes. I read that. Youre not getting my point.
The problem is your orginal statement. "Wanting the law to be upheld only in situations you like" would cover your parents. A law system that would not invoke such a desire cannot exist in a society that still has landlords.
Yeah, we should ban landleeches. Unfortunately that wont happen cause money talks.
If only there was some other place besides money that political power could grow from
Who the fuck wants racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, and anti-worker capitalist laws upheld?
'The rule of law' is a cloud of toxic farts youve been sniffing your whole life while the ruling class hang out on their mega yachts and in their towers (breaking any and all 'laws' they want)
all landlords should be given the choice between immediate execution and having their property expropriated, and having their property expropriated
Not me. Do you?
Totally agree.
Thats fine. Everything youve said has fuck all to do with everything Ive said...
this is a great bit good job
Thank you.
Really had me goin at first
Nah, I've learned my lessons.
What lessons were those, if you don't mind me asking?
Read some of the comments, that should make it fairly clear.
ok
U said "u can't just not want the law to be upheld in some situations" so his question "do u want racist, sexist, etc laws to be upheld" Is a relevant question I am curious abt ur answer btw because uve given 2 seperate answers
Removed by mod
Yeah we can
Thats fine.
If your stance is the destruction of the state, then using or avoiding its legal system by whatever means necessary to further the project of undermining it is a coherent position.
Yeah, true.
Yup.
You don't have some hot take. You have no idea what you're talking about. Literally no one here only wants renters to only take possession of their homes in special cases, nor do we give a fuck about laws that protect landlords.
Do you have no reading compreshension? Take the landlord element out of it.
Because I have reading comprehension I understand that you made am ambiguous statement. In my generosity I interpreted you as saying something much less dumb. If your take is that we need to obey the laws that benefit the rich and powerful because if we don't how are we going to enforce drunk driving or age of consent that's some real smooth brain shit.
So yeah sorry for giving you the benefit of the doubt don't worry it won't happen again
Removed by mod
What good is principal?
It's the only thing we have.
Except that guy that now has a house because he gave up on your principles
Put your principals in one hand and shit in the other. Which one fills up faster?
Your mums fanny.
What happened to those principals?
This is a different subject. :D
Hey Kids...
Did you know that you just playfully touched a Important Subject there . Very Good !
@SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee did you realize how @GarbageShoot@hexbear.net tried to diss your principle , because you can not touch it ?
this is because the Principle is "Inmaterial" , you can not touch it .
Wanna know how the Grownups call it ? "Superstructure"
and @GarbageShoot@hexbear.net he talked about Poop (hi hi). While you should not really touch it (ha ha ha) , if you want you could touch it.
thats because "Poop" is "Material", you can Touch it (and smell it even )
all you can touch , we call "Base" .. and many discussions of the Grownup world are actually just the conflict beetween the "Ideal" (that you can not touch) and the "Real Shit" (that smells) this is called "Dialektiks"
Get over yourself. I presented many actual arguments that you are here ignoring. There, I was just making a joke based on a popular adage ("Wish in one hand . . . ").
i'm 90% sure Thomas is agreeing with you
I'm 90% sure he believes he is moderating a debate between an idealist and a crass materialist.
hey i was on your side . i just wanted to ground the lemmy in theory.. sorry if thats was not clear.
I think it was actually a devastating burn to talk down to someone so hard you could have said the same thing to a 5 year old and they'd get something out of the experience
Who's right @ThomasMuentzner@hexbear.net
i even cropped those teacher images and now garbage shoot things it was friendly fire ...Sad me .. It was a killer post i think..
I agree, I had a ton of fun reading it
As the guy who wrote “what good is principal” and forgot to come back for four days, garbage shoot’s post and your reply were perfect. Truly could not have hoped for better.
deleted by creator
This is so well written I can't disagree with it. My original concern still remains, however.
Yup.