Nakoichi [they/them] to the_dunk_tank • 1 year agoWhat the fuck Dan?imagemessage-square79 fedilinkarrow-up1147file-text
arrow-up1147imageWhat the fuck Dan?Nakoichi [they/them] to the_dunk_tank • 1 year agomessage-square79 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDayOfDoom [any, any]hexbear7·1 year agoRemember when people were saying he was getting radicalized after doing his series on the Haitian revolution? link
minus-squarePM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS [he/him, they/them]hexbear21·1 year agoI think you're mixing him up with Mike Duncan link
minus-squarePM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS [he/him, they/them]hexbear20·1 year agotbf Dan Carlin and Mike Duncan are basically the same name link
minus-squareDayOfDoom [any, any]hexbear9·1 year agoAnyone wanna' compare and contrast if that guy's any better on this? link
minus-squarestar_wraith [he/him]hexbear11·1 year agoI’m sure Mike is better. He’s a radlib but not like, an annoying radlib, if that makes sense. link
minus-squareGhostofLeninsGhost [he/him]hexbear7·1 year agoIt's much better. Much much better. Outside of actually being a Marxist explicitly, he does a great job of explaining the material conditions that laid the grounds for the events that he covers. link
Remember when people were saying he was getting radicalized after doing his series on the Haitian revolution?
I think you're mixing him up with Mike Duncan
Oh then I don't know who this is then.
tbf Dan Carlin and Mike Duncan are basically the same name
Hardcore History. Mike Duncan did Revolutions.
Anyone wanna' compare and contrast if that guy's any better on this?
I’m sure Mike is better. He’s a radlib but not like, an annoying radlib, if that makes sense.
It's much better. Much much better. Outside of actually being a Marxist explicitly, he does a great job of explaining the material conditions that laid the grounds for the events that he covers.