A new study rebukes notion that only men were hunters in ancient times. It found little evidence to support the idea that roles were assigned specifically to each sex. Women were not only physically capable of being hunters, but there is little evidence to support that they were not hunting.
old.reddit.com
Posted in r/science by u/mvea • 1,198 points and 306 comments

They're mostly getting dunked on, but they're wriggling around all over the thread raging about science being made "political."

wojak-nooo frothingfash pit clown-to-clown-communication clown-to-clown-conversation grill-broke elmofire Bwaaa NOOOOO

  • Poogona [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unto Others has a section in it that has always stuck with me about division of labor in large groups vs small ones. Members of small groups tend towards being jacks of all trades, and their roles and duties look very similar to one another, and few functional distinctions can be made between them because anyone might have to do anything at any time. Large groups have a lot more specialization of labor within their structure.

    It's not specifically a book about humans, more of a dry text about the evolutionary theories surrounding altruism. Humans demonstrate it well, but it's a dynamic that other social animals like ants demonstrate too.

    • GrouchyGrouse [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty much this. When you're in a small band or tribe it's "all hands on deck" all the time. There might be lowered expectations of the young and the old but everyone does something to benefit the group.