Oh, sorry I don’t agree with the weird libertarian position that we shouldn’t regulate social ills. We have a duty to society to ensure ill ideas aren’t propagated and opposing it seems like only something a libertarian would agree with
Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.
they have the mpaa ratings. they tell you if it has sex in it
I find those are often not clear.
when the theocratic hays code of prudish Americans isn't strict enough for you
Removed by mod
LOL good bit
Not being an “anything goes” libertarian has to be a bit?
deleted by creator
lmaooo
Oh, sorry I don’t agree with the weird libertarian position that we shouldn’t regulate social ills. We have a duty to society to ensure ill ideas aren’t propagated and opposing it seems like only something a libertarian would agree with
the existence of sex isn't a social ill
Oh sure, it totally hasn’t resulted in unneeded harm to countless individuals
Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.
Pablo Picasso
Irregardless of Picasso’s dream world, most people are in contact with art and can be influenced by it.
deleted by creator