Oh, sorry I don’t agree with the weird libertarian position that we shouldn’t regulate social ills. We have a duty to society to ensure ill ideas aren’t propagated and opposing it seems like only something a libertarian would agree with
Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.
Oh, sorry I don’t agree with the weird libertarian position that we shouldn’t regulate social ills. We have a duty to society to ensure ill ideas aren’t propagated and opposing it seems like only something a libertarian would agree with
the existence of sex isn't a social ill
Oh sure, it totally hasn’t resulted in unneeded harm to countless individuals
Art is never chaste. It ought to be forbidden to ignorant innocents, never allowed into contact with those not sufficiently prepared. Yes, art is dangerous. Where it is chaste, it is not art.
Pablo Picasso
Irregardless of Picasso’s dream world, most people are in contact with art and can be influenced by it.
deleted by creator