On this day in 1884, the "Berlin Conference" began when delegations from nearly every Western European country and the U.S. met in Germany to develop a set of protocols for the seizure and control of African resources.

The conference, which had no African representatives, was the first international conference ever on the subject of Africa, and dealt almost soley with the matter of its exploitation.

At the time, approximately 80% of African land and resources were under domestic control; the influence of Europeans was most strongly exerted on the coast. Following it, colonial powers began seizing resources further inland.

As a result of the conference, which continued into 1885, a "General Act" was signed and ratified by all but one of the 14 nations at the table, the U.S. being the sole exception. The Act's main features were the establishment of a regime of free trade stretching across the middle of Africa, the development of which became the rationale for the recognition of the short-lived "Congo Free State", the abolition of the overland slave trade, and the principle of "effective occupation".

The Conference's rapacious intentions for Africa were noted by outsiders: socialist journalist Daniel De Leon described the conference as "an event unique in the history of political science...Diplomatic in form, it was economic in fact."

Before the Conference ended, the Lagos Observer declared that "the world had, perhaps, never witnessed a robbery on so large a scale." Theodore Holly, the first black Protestant Episcopal Bishop in the U.S., condemned the delegates as having "come together to enact into law, national rapine, robbery and murder".

Berlin 1884: Remembering the conference that divided Africa eu-cool

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do Americans actually get bullied over having Android and "green text"? Jesus. Surprised you all haven't adopted Whatsapp yet.

    • GaveUp [she/her]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, I'm 25 years old and I more often than not, get shit for having both an Android and a 300 dollar Chinese phone from other tech workers

      Funny thing is whenever I meet another European here, they love talking about Chinese phones lol

      • TheCaconym [any]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Makes sense, in the EU (or at least in france-cool) tech workers usually shit on apple.

    • milistanaccount09 [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah I wasn't able to join a group chat with some people because one of them was super up in arms about that while I was in high school

    • TheCaconym [any]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Green text ? I assume you don't mean the 4chan thing ?

      • Frogmanfromlake [none/use name]
        ·
        1 year ago

        It's the green text that shows up when you're texting a phone through imessage that isn't an iphone. I've heard people get ostracized and bullied over it, especially teens.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Man that sucks. No the bullying, like that sucks too, but hte part where somehow society decided that having an apple is prestigious or even acceptable to admit to in public.

    • Nagarjuna [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      iPhone users are a minority, so it's more common to see tribalistic slap fights where people rep their preferred corporate overlord. Like, there's a power imbalance one way where iPhones are a status symbol, but imbalance the other way where Androids are more normal.

      • GaveUp [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends on age group, iphones have about 90% market share amongst Zoomers in USA

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        iPhones are a status symbol,

        And the status it symbolizes is the "I am a huge dork who paid way too much money for a toy" status debuff.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don't even know what this means. My phone is five years old, hasn't had a security update since trump was president, and can do things no modern phone could hope to achieve (type comfortably at an acceptable words per minute)

    • ilyenkov [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, I've never heard of that. I have an android, but what's green text?

      I don't get the point of whatsapp, tbh