Image: the last sight of many a commie.


Please pronounce his name wrong to make the title pun work better.

Anyway - Javier Milei, a caricature of a libertarian invented deep in the Hexbear Bit Factory, has won the Argentinian general election; and with a 12 point lead over Massa, it wasn't even particularly close. There are several analogies for this situation - Trump beating Hillary, Bolsonaro winning in 2018, or the alternate universe where Le Pen beat Macron. Massa is not a great guy. The last couple years have been difficult for Argentina, facing massive inflation and the same general economic downturns that are happening everywhere.

Milei is an... interesting person. To name just a couple things going on in his deeply bizarre life, he has a very special relationship with his sister, and an even more special relationship with his mastiff, Conan. When Conan died in 2017, he was so utterly distraught that he had him cloned into four new dogs, named Murray, Milton, Robert, and Lucas, for his economist idols. And he uses mediums to speak to his dead dog. This is probably the closest we're ever going to get to having a dog be president of a country.

Milei wants to essentially collapse the economy even harder. Playing off the general public sentiment of "dollar = good, peso = bad", he has vowed to make the national currency of Argentina the US dollar, thus eagerly giving a massive amount of control over the Argentinian economy directly to America. He wants to take a chainsaw to the status quo, cut off trade with communist countries like China, and demolish the Central Bank. Will Argentinian capitalists and the Senate let him do this? Probably not. What happens with their membership in BRICS+? Who knows. Where does Peronism go from here? Who can say.

But he still won, and will now be president. I suppose that every dog has its day.


Friendly reminder: when commenting about a news event, especially something that just happened, please provide a source of some kind. While ideally this would be on nitter or archived, any source is preferable to none at all given.

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.


Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA daily-ish reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news (and has automated posting when the person running it goes to sleep).
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Various sources that are covering the Ukraine conflict are also covering the one in Palestine, like Rybar.


The Country of the Week is Argentina! Feel free to chime in with books, essays, longform articles, even stories and anecdotes or rants. More detail here.

This week's update is here!

Your Thursday Briefing.

Your Friday Briefing.

Your Saturday Briefing.

Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Links and Stuff

The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The Bundeswehr only has around 50,000 assault rifles… not even every second soldier in the army would have a rifle.

    Is that exclusively counting the combat arms branches or the total headcount of the kraut army? If it's the latter then it's a bit on the dishonest side since there's many support roles that flat out don't touch weapons like dentistry or military law.

    Also imagine joining the military to become a dentist or a lawyer. Fucking weird.

    Addendum: 50,000, if they're all actually working, infantry rifles is pitifully wretched in terms of modern armies. That's, if you go with the minimum, barely five infantry divisions.

    • 420stalin69
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      According to Wikipedia, the bundeswher has 180,000 “in uniform”, 30,000 reservists, and 80,000 in “civilian” support roles.

      Of the 180,000 in uniform, about 30,000 of them has so far received their second pair (the “light pair”) of combat boots after 8 years of the project to provide two sets (a heavy and light set) to their soldiers.

      I’m not sure exactly how many rifles are needed for each actually front line soldier to have one, but recently the German military requested 60,000 more rifles as a matter of urgency, funding was approved for 30,000, and it’s expected to be several years for this approval to be satisfied.

      There are severe issues in equipping the bundeswher. And it’s not actually money that is the problem. It’s the 6th most well-funded military in the world.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the 6th most well-funded military in the world

        Anyone that's looked into military logistics can flat out tell you that funding doesn't equal quality nor quantity. Something as simple as buying a box of nails, which would be like 3-4 dollars, would have its price easily inflated to 20 dollars or more for, the overwhelmingly majority of the time, arbitrary reasons. One of the military's major flaws under capitalism in fact, paper tiger-itus.

        • Teekeeus
          ·
          edit-2
          26 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them]MA
            ·
            1 year ago

            Price-gougers should be shot.

            Even if it's incredibly funny and is fucking up our military in the most strangest ways

      • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are severe issues in equipping the bundeswher. And it’s not actually money that is the problem.

        Can I ask what the source of this rot is? This seems to go well beyond institutional inertia. My best guess is that Germany doesn't really have a military industrial complex in the same way as the USA, so their military suffers from the same neolib decay that plagues every government function?

        • 420stalin69
          ·
          1 year ago

          It seems a mix of things.

          Partly it’s because funding tends to be short term for various reasons. This means that it’s difficult to convince private industry to make the investment required to ensure supply. Private industry doesn’t want to outlay tens or hundreds of millions of € setting up a factory because without a guarantee of on-going sales over decades then private industry runs the risk of “holding the bag” and outlaying that investment only to discover the next purchase order didn’t get approved meaning all that investment was for nothing.

          This has two critical effects, one being that they just don’t make these investments which means stuff that does get made is more “custom” or boutique and not usually mass produced so doesn’t benefit from economies of scale. Secondly it means they want to recoup their investment immediately (MIC gotta feed) so instead of amortizing their profit over a run of hundreds or thousands of units, they want to recoup immediately which means charging exorbitant prices up front (or rather, even more exorbitant prices than your run of the mill western MIC.)

          Another problem is a lack of suppliers or suppliers operating in what amount to cartels so you get the usual price gouging.

          Another problem is that no one important ever gets fired for a project running decades late and billions over budget but they will get punished if things aren’t done by the book. So the incentives aren’t there for leadership to actually seek efficiency. There’s little upside in actually being on time or on budget and there’s no important downside to being over budget and behind schedule.

          Another problem is the frequent German mindset when making a plan, that you stick to the plan, and if you have to change the plan then that means the plan was bad which means you were bad.

          There’s also the nato mindset that believes great power wars can be won with small highly elite forces with excellent toys so there is an emphasis on quality and an intentional disregard for quantity, a focus on wunderwaffe and small elite units, a concept which is literally being demolished in Ukraine right now. The focus was always on having several hundred extremely good tanks instead of thousands of good tanks or on expensive fancy smart bombs rather than small arms and artillery shells.

          It’s almost as though they are still thinking in terms of being tiny Prussia needing to win short decisive wars. An political aversion to fighting a big violent war (understandable) has lead to blinkered thinking. Since they don’t want to fight a big violent war, they didn’t equip for one and so instead equipped themselves for a short sharp and decisive war, basically out of wishful thinking or some kind of psychological aversion - although I hope they’re right that a big violent war doesn’t happen nonetheless they’re in a position of extreme vulnerability by allowing this aversion to mean they simply aren’t prepared for a big violent war.

          There’s also the pacifist movement in Germany which has always been strong, although unfortunately weakening greatly in recent decades. This meant it was simply uncomfortable to have a big powerful army so the compromise was to focus on a small elite force.

          • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I appreciate the effortpost! Privatization of national defense suppliers is the ultimate example of why (neoliberal) capitalism will and must fail, I think. This is a great case study into why