Literally just mainlining marketing material straight into whatever’s left of their rotting brains.

  • UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    deleted by creator

    • WithoutFurtherBelay
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Donald Duck is correct here but also that’s precisely why techbros are so infuriating. They take that conclusion and then use it to disregard everything except the one thing they conveniently think isn’t based on chemicals, like free market capitalism or Eliezer “Christ the Second” Yud

      Dismissing emotions just because they are chemicals is nonsensical. It makes no sense that that alone would invalidate anything whatsoever. But these people think it does because they are conditioned by Protestantism to think that all meaning has to come from a divine and unshakeable authority. That’s why they keep reinventing God, so they have something to channel their legitimate emotions through that their delusional brain can’t invalidate.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • WithoutFurtherBelay
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, I agree completely. I had to rewrite my comment multiple times to clarify that, but yeah. Sorry :(

          • UlyssesT
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            deleted by creator

            • WithoutFurtherBelay
              ·
              1 year ago

              I understand, either way the meme you posted is funny though because it would piss techbros off

              • UlyssesT
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                deleted by creator

      • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        He's not though

        life is necessarily more ordered and interesting than dead rocks

        therefore it is a good thing to create more life, both on earth and eventually to turn dead planets life-ful (if this is even possible)

        we are definitely conscious enough to at least massively increase the amount of life on earth (you could easily green all the world's deserts under ecocommunism)

          • sooper_dooper_roofer [none/use name]
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think enabling mass reproduction of plant species in the Sahara Desert is cool and good

            (and yes I've done the calculations, no the Sahara doesn't "enable" the Amazon, it's like 3 grains of sand per square foot)

    • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      "All knowledge is unprovable and so nothing can be known" is a more hopeless position than "existence is absurd and meaning has to come from within". I shall both fight and perish.

      • UlyssesT
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        deleted by creator

        • Saeculum [he/him, comrade/them]
          ·
          1 year ago

          and doing the heavy lifting for LLM hype marketers.

          I'm not fighting for those idiots. We're a long way away from a real machine intelligence.

      • GarbageShoot [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, "meaning has to come from within" is sort of solipsistic but, depending on your definition, completely true.

        The biggest problem with Camus (besides his credulity towards the western press and his lack of commitment to trains, oh and lacking any desire for systemic understanding) is that he views this question in an extremely antisocial manner. Yes, if you want affirmation from rocks and you will kill yourself if you don't get affirmation from rocks, there's not much to do but get some rope. However, it's hard to imagine how differently the rhetorical direction of the Myth of Sisyphus would have gone if he had just considered more seriously the idea of finding meaning in relationships with and impact on others rather than just resenting the trees for not respecting you. Seriously, go and reread it, the idea seems as though it didn't even cross his mind.

        The Myth of Solipsists kelly