And here I thought this shit would expose the blatant contradictions in IP law but it looks like it’s only creating the same cycle of vocal contrarians speaking out against a step in the right direction
And here I thought this shit would expose the blatant contradictions in IP law but it looks like it’s only creating the same cycle of vocal contrarians speaking out against a step in the right direction
The worst people you know are fighting lol. Expanding the scope of IP law to make AI even worse. NYT & other papers will bundle articles in 'datasets' and sell them. Probably through an offshore IP holding company which will create a 'market' which companies can point to in transfer pricing. The 'ethical AI' rhetoric is used because it makes people think of job loss.
It’s going to quickly devolve into two billionaires fighting over who’s yacht is bigger if it hasn’t already