you've missed the text in picking up the subtext. the comparison of circumcision to sexual violence is wild on it's face. it gets wilder when you know he means all SV. I can't tell if you're missing the misogyny and how inappropriate it is to use this thread to go off about how terrible circumcision is - a practice I am unequivocally not defending - or if you straight up can't read.
I will of course not defend any antifeminism he's saying elsewhere, but I do take the text to be about genital cutting, and i don't see how that could ever not fall under sexual violence when what's his ass kellogg was fervently anti-masturbation and him/his ideology are why it became a thing in protestant mayoland.
I don't think the intent is there, johnny here is just anti circumcision (and worded it very unfortunately) which is a good thing and even trans positive because you get better outcomes with SRS later in life without infant mutilation involved
omg hexbear circumcision is not worse than SA. please be normal.
deleted by creator
whoa wait who said anything about "worse"? It's a violation of bodily autonomy and that should be sufficient
read the OP! it's literally the subject of this thread!
he's doing racism, saying he had his genitals mutilated which is something dirty muslims do but doesn't happen in "the west" so much
he literally - in those exact words - said it's worse than
CW: SA
rape
and that it's a greater harm than western women know. he's doing a lot more than being racist.
and if you click into the thread, you'd see that he's downplaying SA to the point that he said it's worse to break a leg.
seriously dude read the OP. I'm not talking about subtext. you've failed to read the actual text.
i have only read the screenshot and i'm gonna not click through, that sounds like a bad time.
you've missed the text in picking up the subtext. the comparison of circumcision to sexual violence is wild on it's face. it gets wilder when you know he means all SV. I can't tell if you're missing the misogyny and how inappropriate it is to use this thread to go off about how terrible circumcision is - a practice I am unequivocally not defending - or if you straight up can't read.
I will of course not defend any antifeminism he's saying elsewhere, but I do take the text to be about genital cutting, and i don't see how that could ever not fall under sexual violence when what's his ass kellogg was fervently anti-masturbation and him/his ideology are why it became a thing in protestant mayoland.
JohnBrownNote isn't defending the SA comment. Stop badjacketing them.
I don't think the intent is there, johnny here is just anti circumcision (and worded it very unfortunately) which is a good thing and even trans positive because you get better outcomes with SRS later in life without infant mutilation involved