• @Ethalis@jlai.lu
    hexbear
    40
    2 months ago

    You should always start your argument with an ad hominem and, if it doesn't work, slowly work your way towards insulting your interlocutor, the highest form of rethoric

    • BountifulEggnog [they/them]
      hexbear
      13
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i'M mR EtHaLis fRoM SoME rAnDOm JeRk Off wEbSitE YoU'vE NevEr HeArD oF aNd i'M sO sMaRT i kNoW hOW tO DebAte PEopLe On tHe iNteRnEt.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]
        hexbear
        14
        2 months ago

        No no, that's name calling already, you jumped straight to the top. You need to cloak your disdain in a civil tone, because remember the next step is going to tone policing. So something like, "I don't think you have a lot of experience arguing on the internet seeing as you come from a much smaller instance." is much better bait.

            • BountifulEggnog [they/them]
              hexbear
              9
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I thought it was a joke about starting an argument with an ad hominem.

              :smuglord: actually, I think you'll find that I did attack him personally instead of his underlying points, which according to rationalwiki, counts.

              spoiler

              It was/is but your bit was better. Admitting being wrong isn't a step though. That's also why I deleted it until you responded because I realized I'm not funny 😢

              • mathemachristian [he/him]
                hexbear
                6
                2 months ago

                kubrick-stare Where are the FACTS and LOGIC??

                spoiler

                The issue with ironic shitposting in a nutshell. I'm going to tap out though before we are under so many layers of irony the whole thing caves in