I just wanna start DMing a game and I need to buy $150 in books to do so? The fuck.

Edit: Lots of people telling me to play other systems. Here’s what’s up:

  • I want to play a 1-on-1 game with my wife
  • I’ve never DMed before
  • She’s never played a TTRPG, so this would be her introduction
  • She’s been reading a lot of fae-related fantasy, which has me thinking she may want to play roleplay heavy with some fae storylines present
  • Ideally the system wouldn’t be too crunchy or combat focused

Edit 2: I’ve spoken with her and she actually wants a more modern setting

  • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Dungeons and Dragons is like a specific name-brand RPG product owned by a shitty company called Wizards of the Coast.

    Other people and companies make other RPG systems. Pathfinder is probably the biggest and is pretty similar to DnD and has a similar setting. However there's so many games and settings that you can really find something for anyone. Like giant robots? Magical girls? 80s "kids on bikes" adventures? Post apocalypse wastelands? Vampires and werewolves? Etc - there's probably a game that would suit your group

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Advising Pathfinder is a terrible for new player. Heck, i played and GM'ed dozens of different systems over 30 years and Pathfinder has been one of the most miserable and abysmal experiences for me.

      • Kuori [she/her]
        ·
        19 hours ago

        i'm genuinely curious as to what makes you feel that way, if you're interested in sharing (i promise this is not a weird gotcha)

        • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          Pathfinder have huge crunch which is imo completely unnecessary. I know there are people loving that, but i'm not one of them. I mean when my players start to moan and growl instead of cheer when levelling it's time to change system, asap.

          • Kuori [she/her]
            ·
            13 hours ago

            understandable, i grew up on 3.0 and 3.5 so pf always felt relatively intuitive for me, but it's definitely not for everyone.

            personally i don't think the crunch is unnecessary per se but i think i would have liked to see a little more care taken to which pieces were ported over. i suppose that's what 2e is for