Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to movies • 1 day agoOh noimagemessage-square37 fedilinkarrow-up180file-text
arrow-up180imageOh noDirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to movies • 1 day agomessage-square37 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCthulhusIntern [he/him]hexbear19·1 day agoIf you're going to make a movie about a superhero who has outdated values, you already have the perfect superhero for that in Captain America. Why Superman? link
minus-squareBodyBySisyphus [he/him]hexbear16·1 day agoCaptain America is owned by a different money-grubbing corporate Goliath link
minus-squareSulvor [he/him, undecided]hexbear19·1 day agoFunny answer: They gotta tap into the unironic Homelander fan demographic Real answer: Marvel vs DC. Everything Marvel has to tie into the overly convoluted MCU and spawn 2-3 submovies link
minus-squareEricthescruffy [he/him]hexbear7·1 day agoCaptain America is Marvel. Superman is DC. ...nah..its really not anymore complicated than that. link
If you're going to make a movie about a superhero who has outdated values, you already have the perfect superhero for that in Captain America. Why Superman?
Captain America is owned by a different money-grubbing corporate Goliath
Funny answer: They gotta tap into the unironic Homelander fan demographic
Real answer: Marvel vs DC. Everything Marvel has to tie into the overly convoluted MCU and spawn 2-3 submovies
Captain America is Marvel. Superman is DC. ...nah..its really not anymore complicated than that.