One is a "civility issue", which is supremely important, the other is "international human rights" which is color coded and unimportant. Please stop losing sight of what could complicate Harris' legendary candidacy.
Really does highlight that the only real problem libs have with trump is that he's rude (which was also their loudly stated problem with back in the day, even though he wasn't)
The way I have heard them explain it, they are trying to play the long game. They're hoping Trump destroys the Republican party (again) so that they can court even more white suburbanites (again). Didn't work before, but will now for...nebulous reasons.
It also gives them a convenient scapegoat AND a reason to get more racist
of course, it's also a 'donor class v voter class' thing
I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they 
for.
She’ll distance herself from a single comment from Biden about Trump supporters but not distance herself from Biden’s genocide in Gaza, got it.
One is a "civility issue", which is supremely important, the other is "international human rights" which is color coded and unimportant. Please stop losing sight of what could complicate Harris' legendary candidacy.
Really does highlight that the only real problem libs have with trump is that he's rude (which was also their loudly stated problem with
back in the day, even though he wasn't)
deleted by creator
One group is eligible to vote for her (they won't lmao, but what if they did?)
The other can't
deleted by creator
The way I have heard them explain it, they are trying to play the long game. They're hoping Trump destroys the Republican party (again) so that they can court even more white suburbanites (again). Didn't work before, but will now for...nebulous reasons.
It also gives them a convenient scapegoat AND a reason to get more racist
of course, it's also a 'donor class v voter class' thing