• _pi@lemmy.ml
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Listen everything Scalia wrote was ideologically consistent because it used the same verbiage as Bush V Gore, "limited to present circumstances".

      • Wheaties [she/her]
        ·
        4 hours ago

        ah, a personal favorite,

        this ruling sets no precedent because I decided it doesn't

        The kind of thing produced by a very real and legitimate court system and definitely not just 9 unaccountable, unelected elders making decisions on a whim.

        • barrbaric [he/him]
          ·
          2 hours ago

          But remember, we can't stack the court with 50 zoomer maoists because people would "lose faith" in the "institutions".