• _pi@lemmy.ml
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Listen everything Scalia wrote was ideologically consistent because it used the same verbiage as Bush V Gore, "limited to present circumstances".

    • Wheaties [she/her]
      ·
      4 hours ago

      ah, a personal favorite,

      this ruling sets no precedent because I decided it doesn't

      The kind of thing produced by a very real and legitimate court system and definitely not just 9 unaccountable, unelected elders making decisions on a whim.

      • barrbaric [he/him]
        ·
        2 hours ago

        But remember, we can't stack the court with 50 zoomer maoists because people would "lose faith" in the "institutions".