breadandcircuses [she/her] to Main • 4 years agofuck circumcisionmessage-squaremessage-square126 fedilinkarrow-up1188file-text
arrow-up1179message-squarefuck circumcisionbreadandcircuses [she/her] to Main • 4 years agomessage-square126 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
why does the US still just routinely mutilate children? fuck john kellogg's eugenicist corn flake ass
minus-squarePOKEMONGOTOTHEGULAG [none/use name]hexbear5arrow-down14·4 years agoCircumcison is bad but don't call it "mutilation" link
minus-squareTheCaconym [any]hexbear11·4 years agoIt's cutting part of the body of a kid that can't consent. Unless it's done for a valid and important medical reason, it's mutilation. link
minus-squarePOKEMONGOTOTHEGULAG [none/use name]hexbear1arrow-down1·4 years agoBy that logic SRS is mutilation. And it just gives sceptics ammunition to accuse you of comparing it to FGM. link
minus-squaregarbology [he/him]hexbear6·4 years ago By that logic Gender confirmation surgery and circumcision should not be done except for valid medical reasons where the patient can freely give informed consent. There's no contradiction. link
minus-squarebreadandcircuses [she/her]hexagonhexbear3·4 years agocatch me comparing circumcision to FGM, actually by that logic SRS is mutilation no, because of what caconym said: a kid that can't consent link
Circumcison is bad but don't call it "mutilation"
It's cutting part of the body of a kid that can't consent. Unless it's done for a valid and important medical reason, it's mutilation.
By that logic SRS is mutilation. And it just gives sceptics ammunition to accuse you of comparing it to FGM.
Gender confirmation surgery and circumcision should not be done except for valid medical reasons where the patient can freely give informed consent. There's no contradiction.
catch me comparing circumcision to FGM, actually
no, because of what caconym said:
Infant genital mutilation is bad, okay?