Fellas. What the fuck? My bros. Some of y'all need to beat the fuck out of some of your associates.
agreed on principle (fuck patriarchy) but I feel compelled to point a few things out.
twitter polls are dogshit since they are only reflective of the opinions of a given person's followers. richard hanania is some right wing pundit (I had to look him up), so of course his audience is like this.
since way more male-identifying are answering his poll than female-identifying, of course the numbers for both "yes" and "no" are higher. All this tells you is that 88.1% of the poll's respondents are "male". The remaining 11.9% are female. So you just have a much bigger male sample size. Which makes sense. It's a male right wing pundit on twitter. This ties back with point #1
If you want to find out the actual yes-to-no ratio, you have to isolate the gender. 1.8/10.2 = 0.1765.... so about 17.65% of "females" answered "yes" ... 14.4/73.7 = 0.1954... so about 19.54% of "males" answered "yes". Once you isolate the gender, you find out that both the "males" and "females" following this right wing pundit on twitter answered similarly. Of course the "males" have a much larger sample size.
Fellas. What the fuck? My bros. Some of y'all need to beat the fuck out of some of your associates.
That's 1.8% compared to 12% total female respondents. Both genders responded at about equal rates of yes/no
ladies! its time to start throwing hands as well!!! enbies i guess we gotta fight other enbies idk the rules.
One of the replies is from an apparently known account saying she wish she had the chance or something like that. Grim.
very grim. sadly i have met women like that. usually former victims though, so i have sympathy up until they hurt someone.
I was under the assumption that Hanania had wanted that exact kind of reply when he made the poll so he can slide into their DMs.
To be clear account owner is very much an adult saying this. It was something like "wish I had a time machine so i could go back and do this".
enby hands are rated E for everyone. it's equality!
oh jeez, i wasnt even thinking that through. yeah holy shit
agreed on principle (fuck patriarchy) but I feel compelled to point a few things out.
twitter polls are dogshit since they are only reflective of the opinions of a given person's followers. richard hanania is some right wing pundit (I had to look him up), so of course his audience is like this.
since way more male-identifying are answering his poll than female-identifying, of course the numbers for both "yes" and "no" are higher. All this tells you is that 88.1% of the poll's respondents are "male". The remaining 11.9% are female. So you just have a much bigger male sample size. Which makes sense. It's a male right wing pundit on twitter. This ties back with point #1
If you want to find out the actual yes-to-no ratio, you have to isolate the gender. 1.8/10.2 = 0.1765.... so about 17.65% of "females" answered "yes" ... 14.4/73.7 = 0.1954... so about 19.54% of "males" answered "yes". Once you isolate the gender, you find out that both the "males" and "females" following this right wing pundit on twitter answered similarly. Of course the "males" have a much larger sample size.
Ms maxwell voted yes