https://nitter.net/RichardHanania/status/1720992936052306000

  • AcidSmiley [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    Hard no to the first question, but the scientific community is still debating about the second one.

      • AcidSmiley [she/her]
        ·
        8 months ago

        I've been cracked for a couple years at this point, there's just no established scientific consensus if "nonbinary transbian mailbomber (she / her)" counts as a feeeeeemale gender identity or if it dumps the entire concept of binary gender into a burning garbage can.

        • SchillMenaker [he/him]
          ·
          8 months ago

          Dumping the entire concept of binary gender into a burning garbage can is the only acceptable gender.

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]
            ·
            8 months ago

            If your gender identity doesn't dump the entire concept of binary gender into a burning garbage can you should just give it back, you're obviously not doing anything worthwhile with it.

            • SchillMenaker [he/him]
              ·
              8 months ago

              On a practical level, defaulting to pronouns is still supportive of people struggling to fit their identity into the existing binary. My opinions on gender, while 100% unimpeachably correct, come from a position of privilege within the existing structure. Gender is like the stock market, it's all imaginary bullshit but it still impacts pretty much every aspect of your life.

  • booty [he/him]
    ·
    8 months ago

    yes, male 14.4%

    yes, female 1.8%

    Fellas. What the fuck? My bros. Some of y'all need to beat the fuck out of some of your associates.

    • CommieCretzl [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      That's 1.8% compared to 12% total female respondents. Both genders responded at about equal rates of yes/no

        • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]
          hexagon
          ·
          8 months ago

          One of the replies is from an apparently known account saying she wish she had the chance or something like that. Grim.

          • Othello [comrade/them, love/loves]
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            very grim. sadly i have met women like that. usually former victims though, so i have sympathy up until they hurt someone.

          • AcidSmiley [she/her]
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was under the assumption that Hanania had wanted that exact kind of reply when he made the poll so he can slide into their DMs.

            • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]
              hexagon
              ·
              8 months ago

              To be clear account owner is very much an adult saying this. It was something like "wish I had a time machine so i could go back and do this".

      • booty [he/him]
        ·
        8 months ago

        oh jeez, i wasnt even thinking that through. yeah holy shit

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Fellas. What the fuck? My bros. Some of y'all need to beat the fuck out of some of your associates.

      agreed on principle (fuck patriarchy) but I feel compelled to point a few things out. nerd

      1. twitter polls are dogshit since they are only reflective of the opinions of a given person's followers. richard hanania is some right wing pundit (I had to look him up), so of course his audience is like this.

      2. since way more male-identifying are answering his poll than female-identifying, of course the numbers for both "yes" and "no" are higher. All this tells you is that 88.1% of the poll's respondents are "male". The remaining 11.9% are female. So you just have a much bigger male sample size. Which makes sense. It's a male right wing pundit on twitter. This ties back with point #1

      3. If you want to find out the actual yes-to-no ratio, you have to isolate the gender. 1.8/10.2 = 0.1765.... so about 17.65% of "females" answered "yes" ... 14.4/73.7 = 0.1954... so about 19.54% of "males" answered "yes". Once you isolate the gender, you find out that both the "males" and "females" following this right wing pundit on twitter answered similarly. Of course the "males" have a much larger sample size.

  • Tachanka [comrade/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    i don't know why, but I thought the "CSA" in the content warning stood for confederate states of america... thought this was gonna be a thread about dunking on slave owners sicko-wistful

  • Beaver [he/him]
    ·
    8 months ago

    The framing of this question is an extreme indictment of the material conditions of our society.

  • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]
    ·
    8 months ago

    no option for "she gets the money and a protective order, epstein gets the wall, her parents get a few decades of reeducation, and we figure out who that body double was that died in prison"

  • Magician [he/him, they/them]
    cake
    ·
    8 months ago

    Using the precious finite time on earth and the near-infinite potential of the human imagination to think of hypothetical situations where it's okay for a fourteen year old girl to be assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein.

  • privatized_sun [none/use name]
    ·
    8 months ago

    mutual funds

    meanwhile middle class leftoids screeching about "I'm not a fascist just because I invest in the stock market"

  • anonochronomus [comrade/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    This mf gets money dumped into his accounts by vampires just for saying the most awful shit he can come up with. Sure, this is a normal, healthy , functioning society and totally not a death cult, why not?

    The results are in; I'm sorry David, but you are a pedophile. Ok now, up against the wall. Cigarette? Blindfold? Nighty night.

  • gaycomputeruser [she/her]
    ·
    8 months ago

    For refrence:

    16% of men replied yes 15% of women replied yes

    Dont't forget about the very strong selection bias in this poll.

  • charlie
    ·
    8 months ago

    The fuck my NB option at