Map of countries with bans: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0b/Burka_ban_world_map.svg/1024px-Burka_ban_world_map.svg.png
Map of countries with bans: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0b/Burka_ban_world_map.svg/1024px-Burka_ban_world_map.svg.png
The article itself is quoting from a law called Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region Regulation on De-extremification, chapter II, article 9:
As far as I have understood from hearing from Uighurs is that neither face coverings nor the specific beards referred to(Basically long ass under the chin) are traditional to Uighurs nor have been common before the influx of Wahhabism in the region, this is different from France or other countries banning people who have long standing traditions in their specific culture to wear these things. Now you may disagree with the policy on principle and thats a fine stance to take, but its not honest or correct to make these two policies into the exact same.
This is similar to when accusations arise of forcing Uighurs to drink alcohol, there are long standing traditions of home brewing wine in Xinjiang among the Uighur, there is no reason to force anyone to drink alcohol cause for the most part they already do, unless again there is influence from traditions outside of Xinjiang and the Uighurs.
This whole post really feels more like an attempt of dishonest dunking on people rather than an honest and good faith discussion about China and Xinjiang, if you wanna discuss these policies then discuss them, don't make a bait and switch where its really obvious anyone reading will think of France and then go "Sike its actually Xinjiang bet you feel foolish now".
I didn't know it was banned in France, sorry.
I can't exactly call you a liar since I don't know what you know or don't know but the threads structure is really suspect, and again, I made other points that you could meet about the specific situations and reasonings for the laws made in Xinjiang.
The reasonings are about extremism/terrorism
Yes, what do you think about them?
It feels like you are doing this neutral facade cause you came in prepared with articles and archive links but you don't really seem to have an open opinion about it.
Most hotly debated issues have valid points on both sides:
Valid points for the ban: It oppresses women, it's not required by the Qu'ran, women never choose to wear it, hiding your face is creepy in many valid cultures
Valid points against the ban: anonymity is good, women do choose to wear it, cultural freedom
But in this specific situation also the things mentioned are not part of the actual traditional culture of the region and the people, but something deliberately spread by a more extreme tendency of the religion. Like if one of the christian sects like the Jehovas Witnesses or whatever started spreading far more conservative traditions and values into a region with no tradition of them. I would say that creates a special situation where religious freedom is of course hurt and there probably are immigrants who have this as their traditional culture who may be hurt, but also that this is a step in undermining a very real attempt to spread extreme traditions and tendencies by foreign groups and powers.
Hey, could I get some sources for the Uighur culture not having long beards, drinking wine, not covering faces etc? I'm currently reading through this site and the laws and stuff cited there do make China appear really bad.
Does that make it more justified or less?