from the author of the map:

"Alkebu-lan: If Africa Was Never Colonized By Europe

Alkebu-lan is the oldest name for Africa. In Arabic, it means “The Land of the Blacks.”

Hi, my name is Nikolaj Cyon and I am an artist from Sweden who has worked with precolonial Africa as a theme in my art for over a year. I have, as a mind experiment, made a map of what Africa could have looked like in the mid 19th century if Europe had never become a colonizing world power. In order to do this I have tried to construct an alternative historical time-line in which Europe was much harder struck by the plague in the 1350’s and never recovered. Therefore African nations would have gotten the opportunity to flourish unhindered.

But the project is really about real historical precolonial African nations, and I have tried to form a map of the most prominent of those that existed between the 15th and mid 19th century, by looking at historical maps like the one found in UNESCO’s “A General History of Africa”, linguistic regions and natural boundaries."

link

  • Infamousblt [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Once again I am asking you to literally just request the comm https://hexbear.net/c/commrequest

    Show bernie-pout

    • moonlake [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      But this is more fun! And it has already been requested there years ago. This way it will be seen by more people so it's easier to gauge interest.

  • quarrk [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Flipped maps are always fascinating in themselves. It’s surprising how much the orientation of a map informs the viewer about its contents.

  • Dolores [love/loves]
    ·
    1 year ago

    why are the ottomans not administering all of north africa? with such a weak europe they should've run roughshod over the entire medditerrean

    • thelastaxolotl [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe the ottomans never unified anatolia and its still divided between beliks

      • Dolores [love/loves]
        ·
        1 year ago

        oh i looked at the more detailed version of the map on the website, they're around. didn't realise the posted one doesn't have the outlying territories labeled. i bet it's more about considering the Ottomans a 'colonizing' force but thats very 1900s and distinctly not an african thing

        • thelastaxolotl [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yea i saw it, it weird how they didnt expand into egypt after taking syria and hejaz, i guess maybe they got locked into too many costly wars with persia