EDIT: I don't mean impostor syndrome isn't real, just that PMCs abuse it to excuse their position.

    • carbohydra [des/pair]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      implying the academy in the western world in the year 2021 contributes to society

      (I'm not saying a hypothetical academy couldn't)

      • gvngndz [none/use name,comrade/them]
        ·
        4 years ago

        How does the academy not contribute to society? They teach topics that are(or rather can be) niche and/or complex. They also do a fair amount of research. What else does the academy need to do?

        • carbohydra [des/pair]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          But now we are talking about the hypothetical academy. The one we have now in the real world is busy chasing money from corporations who want ways to make their products 0.01759% more efficient. If your research doesn't align with that, you have no future in the academy.

          • gvngndz [none/use name,comrade/them]
            ·
            4 years ago

            That's true for every prole in the world. We're all working for corporations chasing money, how are academicians any different? It's not like their research is meaningless because corporation benefit from it, we benefit too.

            • carbohydra [des/pair]
              hexagon
              ·
              4 years ago

              oh yeah, name 3 inventions from the last 40 years that have been a net benefit to the proletariat

                  • gvngndz [none/use name,comrade/them]
                    ·
                    4 years ago

                    I think what happened here is that you had a spicy take that you didn't really think about in depth before posting, and now you're trying to save face by cracking jokes and backpedaling in the comments, but it's OK I forgive you. We all post stupid shit from time to time.

                    • carbohydra [des/pair]
                      hexagon
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      4 years ago

                      you're not wrong, but I'm also genuinely curious what positive effect the academy has had recently. we just put people there because it's supposed to "give them opportunities to escape poverty"

                      and I wasn't originally thinking of academics, just PMCs in general (who must ofc pass through the academy)

                      • gvngndz [none/use name,comrade/them]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        4 years ago

                        Idk, probably a lot of scientific research is done by academicians. There are also many Anarchist/Communist/Marxist academicans (Mark Fisher, Zizek, Chomsky, etc) who have written a lot of insightful books. They also teach thousands of people during their careers.

                        • carbohydra [des/pair]
                          hexagon
                          ·
                          4 years ago

                          For every Zizek there are a thousand Milton Friedmans. What good is inventing a vaccine if the mainstream academy makes excuses for why hoarding it is good actually?

                          • gvngndz [none/use name,comrade/them]
                            ·
                            edit-2
                            4 years ago

                            Most people are like this, most people are liberals and the labour of most people primarily benefits corporations, I just don't understand why you criticize academia so heavily as if it's unique in some way. But I think we are not going to be able to understand each other, so let's just stop and agree to disagree.

                            • carbohydra [des/pair]
                              hexagon
                              ·
                              4 years ago

                              maybe I wasn't quick enough with my ninja edit:

                              and I wasn’t originally thinking of academics, just PMCs in general (who must ofc pass through the academy)

                              You brought up academia so I decided to explore it, but I think we should agree about the most important part of the PMC imo, middle managers, corporate lawyers, advertisers, etc. Those were the people I had in mind with the meme.

          • RowPin [they/them]
            ·
            edit-2
            4 years ago

            There is a "communist" (I guess) position on imposter syndrome, but this isn't it. Gegenstandpunkt/Ruthless Criticism does critiques of various social sciences and shows their various issues/why they arise; people can probably suss out why imposter syndrome would arise in humanities majors from there.

            e: For a funny example, 'Marxist philosopher' Althusser admitted once that he essentially had no real knowledge of Marx or Hegel when he became a professor, and that he would often assign essays on philosophers purely so he could learn while he was grading them. He even proudly proclaimed that he "learned by hearsay" and would tell colleagues this. Don't Do That!

        • bewts [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          Is it a distinction without a purpose? I assumed OP was talking about the managerial class. Maybe my wires are crossed. Are managers workers? I am confused now.

          • Bluegrass_Buddhist [none/use name]
            ·
            4 years ago

            You could argue both classes are similiar because they're both relatively privileged by their position within capitalism and thus incentivized to protect the status quo. But their relationship to production is different.

            Petit bourg are small business owners, independent contractors, self-produced artists, etc. People who technically own the means of production but don't exploit much of others' labor to extract profit.

            Labor aristocracy is a looser term. It refers to a section of the working class (people who own no capital and sell their time and labor for a wage) that benefits from the exploitation of other sections of the working class. Some people take this to mean all workers in the imperial core, others use it to refer to supervisors and managers and the like, and some use it as a stand-in for the PMC - doctors and lawyers and such.

    • carbohydra [des/pair]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      I have heard it used this way though. By its nature it's not common to say it publicly though

  • Gr8M8 [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    When the labor aristocrat living by exploitation and nepotism is SUS!

    • carbohydra [des/pair]
      hexagon
      ·
      4 years ago

      I meant that people don't realize that they benefit from systems of oppression, which is why they use this excuse instead.

    • carbohydra [des/pair]
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      the bribed proletariat of the imperialist core, sometimes only referring to the upper segments. personally I think it has a lot in common with the PMC

  • domhnall [he/him]
    ·
    4 years ago

    I don’t know who you think you’re helping with this, but it’s definitely not people with imposter syndrome.