iridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-211 months ago[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWimagemessage-square214 fedilinkarrow-up182file-text
arrow-up182image[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI artlockNSFWiridaniotter [she/her] to the_dunk_tank • edit-211 months agomessage-square214 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
https://nitter.net/PeterSinger/status/1722440246972018857 No, the art does not depict bestiality, don't worry.
minus-square7bicycles [he/him]hexbear9·10 months agoI agree here honestly. There's good reasons to not fuck animals, mainly that that they can't consent. However that is absolutely not as to why it's a taboo. Should be though. link
![[CW: bestiality] Professional "moral philosopher" ponders whether it's OK to sexually assault animals, featuring AI art](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/f26b2dce-7254-4537-acd1-5de623b591e0.png){kind=link}
I agree here honestly. There's good reasons to not fuck animals, mainly that that they can't consent.
However that is absolutely not as to why it's a taboo. Should be though.