-_-

Link so y'all don't call me a lib again.

They also like V*ush. Think "eat the rich" is a metaphor for taxation. And say Tankies turned them from Anarcho-Communist to a Neoliberal. Think the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact meant the Soviet Union was fascist. Like, okay, how fucking twisted do your priorities have to be that you dunk on a state that hasn't existed for 30 fucking years instead of, you know, your own state that is currently involved in who know how many fascist conspiracies. And that's it. I'm not going any deeper into their timeline. I'm too tired.

    • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
      ·
      4 years ago

      Leftists did vote as a bloc in 2020, they just didn't vote the way you wanted in the general.

        • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          You said leftists did not exert any voice as a voting bloc in 2020. They did -- both during the primary and the general -- they just didn't vote the way you personally would have had them vote in the latter. That's not the absence of a leftist voting bloc; that's you disagreeing with the voting strategy of that bloc.

          As for Bernie serving as a sheepdog, "sheepdog" implies there was somewhere else to go. But in a two-party system there isn't anywhere else to go. There was no viable third-party candidate as-is, Bernie wouldn't have been viable had he ran as an independent, and it's reasonable to think (note that this does not mean that you have to agree with it) that him running as an independent would have been worse for the left than him endorsing Biden. He got dealt a shit hand in the primary, and when you get dealt a shit hand the results aren't going to look great even if you play it the best you can.

            • MarxMadness [comrade/them]
              ·
              4 years ago

              yeah it does dumbass

              This is reddit-tier asshole stuff, and you're not responding to anything I said, anyway. If I say "this is reasonable even if you ultimately disagree with it" and you reply "no it isn't, I disagree with that," we're not really having a conversation.

                • TheOldRazzleDazzle [he/him]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  This is not good detournement.

                  Also what is your definition of "achieving anything"? According to you has the American left in 50 years "achieved anything?"

                    • TheOldRazzleDazzle [he/him]
                      ·
                      4 years ago

                      not sure if that’s a shitpost or if you don’t quite know what that concept is

                      It's neither. Just referencing your name buddy.

                      It's fine to be pessimistic on a macro scale and say nothing has been done on the left since neoliberalism flattened all morality into the accrual of capital. I do mean that, it's absolutely fair. But then why even comment on or debate about any particular political act or "movement" when it all amounts to the same thing for you?