how does anyone watch this dunning-kruger chuckle fuck speed talk about something he knows nothing about, then after receiving a well informed answer pretend he can't understand ideas or concepts longer than 2 sentences?
like how fucking idiotic do you have to be to think you know more about economics than a Yale grad, PhD in Economics, published, multi-decade professor
it's almost like adversarial methods of adjudication are inherently flawed
debate bros are just doing 'might makes right' for dweebs
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agonism